March 2024

Click the sign-up box below to receive The Score newsletter every Monday morning this season

The biggest game of the weekend ended in a stalemate and only three shots on target, but Liverpool were the big winners as they established a lead at the top with victory over Brighton. Now is the time to hit the front.

At the bottom, Nottingham Forest escape the relegation zone but that’s of little consolation while they’re still failing to win league games. Luton lost, but will not be perturbed by Forest and Everton’s form.

Finally, Erik ten Hag’s team became the second team this season in the Premier League to allow 30 or more shots in multiple matches. The draw at Brentford should confirm his summer fate.

Scroll down for my verdict on every team (listed in table order).

Gameweek 30 results

Saturday 30 March

Sunday 30 March

  • Liverpool 2-1 Brighton
  • Manchester City 0-0 Arsenal

Liverpool

By Pete Hall

When looking for areas where Liverpool would fall short at the start of the season, one part of the pitch was staring you straight in the face. With Fabinho and Jordan Henderson shipped off to Saudi Arabia and Thiago Alcantara as regular a visitor to the treatment room as any member of the club’s medical department, the Liverpool midfield needed a complete makeover and what emerged after the summer transfer window closed drew more gasps than shrieks of delight.

Dominik Szoboszlai has showed glimpses of what he could do without ever being to reach the same heights week after week, Ryan Gravenberch faded fast after a positive start, while Alexis Mac Allister, the number six, always seemed pigeonholed into a position he didn’t really want to play in.

Another reshuffle was needed, but without spending millions on further reinforcements. What has transpired has given Liverpool a midfield talisman on par with anything Kevin De Bruyne and Martin Odegaard offer their respective title juggernauts, one nobody saw coming.

Mac Allister, with an able number six alongside him, is an altogether different beast – one who few have been able to tame. Against his former club, the Argentine completed his transition from six to playmaker with effervescent ease, helping inspire Liverpool to yet another comeback success. Mohamed Salah was missing chance after chance and needed an opening he couldn’t miss. Mac Allister was the one to provide such a pass.

To have this effect, on this team, under this manager, so early into his Anfield career deserves the utmost acclaim. Mac Allister has assisted five goals for Liverpool in the Premier League, equalling his tally for Brighton in a third of the games.

More pertinently, however, four of his five assists for the Reds have been for winning goals, with only Salah setting up more winners in the competition this season. In a campaign where three teams are on course to surpass 90 points, having game changers from deep can have history-making consequences.

Arsenal

Arsenal’s approach was understandable. A point was better for them than City given their one-point lead and their recent record in this stadium. Mikel Arteta’s first-half dance move was to wave both hands down in front of him as if guiding down a helicopter, a “calm down” message that he doesn’t always stick to himself.

If they listened to him often, Arsenal also fouled majestically. In the first half they spread them around with faultless logic to avoid yellow cards, much to the chagrin of those in City blue on the pitch and watching it. Shortly into the second half, Arsenal made three fouls in 2.3 seconds in City’s half. Arsenal ended the game with 20 fouls and two yellow cards, one for time-wasting and the other for kicking the ball away. You can’t teach that.

Arsenal struggled to cope at times. David Raya’s distribution misfired, not helped by him repeatedly slipping over when kicking long. William Saliba has completed 93 per cent of his passes this season but only 12 of 18 before the break. The biggest issue about sitting deep is that, when you get the ball, it tends to be very close to your own goal and thus invites an intense press.

MANCHESTER, ENGLAND - MARCH 31: Gabriel Jesus of Arsenal during the Premier League match between Manchester City and Arsenal FC at Etihad Stadium on March 31, 2024 in Manchester, England.(Photo by Robbie Jay Barratt - AMA/Getty Images)
It’s time for Arsenal to move on from Jesus (Photo: Getty)

Arsenal did create half chances too, although most fell to Gabriel Jesus. Jesus is many fine things, but he’s also ultimately a striker who repeatedly takes an extra touch before shooting because he knows how the shots usually go. Given his inability to complete 90 minutes, Arsenal may surely have to move on from him this summer.

The most obvious way to describe this well-intentioned, high-intensity but ultimately unfulfilling 0-0 draw is that Arsenal got the point that they came for and yet ended Sunday less likely to win the title than when it started. The biggest winners were Liverpool, now with a lead to call their own.

But Arsenal have overcome something; that is why the away end was far the happier. Between November 2017 and April 2023, Arsenal played Manchester City 16 times and lost 15 of them – an FA Cup tie was the exception. They have taken four points off City in the league this season. This is progress. Now to hope that it’s worth more than just consolation for not winning the league.

Man City

There was a period in the first half – OK, it was most of the first half – where this supposed Mega Massive Title Tussle seemed to get stuck in a loop, a closed cycle of play from which it could not escape, like putting your hand through a desk because all the molecules miss each other.

City passed and Arsenal watched and waited. City passed some more and then some more: across and back, occasionally forward and then back again quickly as if feeling the heat. This wasn’t entertainment in the truest sense, excitement only for what might come rather than what was happening. Spoiler alert: it didn’t really ever happen.

The points of interest were tactical, not aesthetic. Josko Gvardiol pushed up left and high, over the ground where Jeremy Doku and Jack Grealish often roam. If that suggests a certain circumspection, controlling the controllables until there could be no more intense controlling, you have it about right.

Guardiola’s response to the first-half funk was to bring on Grealish and Doku, those ground-roamers, as the agents of chaos that we longed for like an elixir. Even that became more than a little predictable because both have become a little jaded by this season’s experience. Grealish is now the master of standing still with the ball, deliberately doing nothing.

Doku took to life in England by basically being exactly the same player he was in France, a whir of feet that bewitch defenders to take their eyes off the ball until it has gone past them. In recent weeks, Doku seems to be playing without studs and with small weights attached to his ankles. What was once glorious unpredictability is now a frustrating conundrum that his teammates are struggling to cope with.

Aston Villa

This has not been an easy first season for Youri Tielemans at Aston Villa. Having had his pick of clubs as a free transfer – and with previous links to almost all of the Premier League’s Big Six – Tielemans eventually chose Villa, a move that allowed him to remain in the Midlands without upping sticks and moving his family. But it also saw him join a team that had a multitude of central midfield options.

Had we given up faith in it working out? Perhaps. Between the start of the season and the end of January, Tielemans started only five league games. In the last of those, Tielemans was replaced after an hour with Villa 3-0 at home to Newcastle.

Then the opportunity presented itself again. Injuries to Jacob Ramsey and Boubacar Kamara, at that point both of whom seemed ahead of Tielemans in Unai Emery’s thoughts, created a space for regular league minutes. He has started each of Villa’s last seven Premier League matches and Villa have won five of those.

He’s finally settling in. Against Wolves on Saturday, Tielemans was able to find space in a congested midfield, starting from a deeper role than normal and thus able to play progressive passes into each of the two forwards. He played one superb through ball to Morgan Rogers, who was unable to create a chance. Another went to Ollie Watkins, who missed the subsequent chance.

Now Tielemans is reaping the rewards. If Villa are able to continue this run, taking them clear of Manchester United in sixth, the Belgian may well get the Champions League football that he was always desperate for when seeking a move away from Leicester. He hasn’t appeared in that competition since Monaco in 2018.

Tottenham

Tottenham have a first-half problem. They sit eighth in a table of half-time scorelines. The minute of their first goal in each of their last six league matches: 61, 46, 77, 50, no goal, 51. Over that same period, Spurs have conceded four first-half goals.

Possibly related: Brennan Johnson has become Tottenham’s super-sub. In his last five substitute appearances in the Premier League, covering 164 minutes, he has contributed two goals and three assists. He has a single goal or assist in his last four league starts.

When Johnson comes on, his pace means that the left-sided central defender is minded to offer cover for the left-back. He creates space for others, most notably Son Heung-min. Ange Postecoglou will say that it doesn’t really matter when you score your goals if you win the match, and obviously he’s right – Johnson can be the secondary threat against tired defences.

But scoring 10 home first-half goals in 15 matches, fewer per game than 10 other teams, is unacceptable given Tottenham’s attacking options. Correcting that imbalance would almost certainly guarantee Spurs Champions League football.

Man Utd

Until now, Erik ten Hag has been preaching a mantra of sustainability. He has not claimed that anything is perfect, nor that the progression of his tenure is in a straight upward line. Instead, he’s said that things are building because the process is good. Finetune what is working well, he says, and we will eventually see the rewards.

But here’s the thing: the sustainability thing doesn’t wash when there are so many systemic issues with the team. Ten Hag says that allowing so many shots – 31 in the 1-1 draw with Brentford and only Luton Town and Sheffield United have faced more per game – is not a problem per se, using the philosophical defence. But then the reality slaps you across the face: Manchester United have kept three clean sheets in their last 16 league games. You don’t get to plead your way out of that.

Ten Hag says that the attack will come together and has bemoaned his injury misfortune, but many Premier League teams have suffered similar fates and his has still scored fewer than Luton. Under Ole Gunnar Solskjaer, we used to talk about individuality without a system, a team with no coherent tactical plan other than to rely upon brilliant players producing brilliant moments.

Although Solskjaer’s plan was eventually undermined by its diminishing returns, it at least had some merit because United had individuals capable of producing those moments. What do they have now? Bruno Fernandes is perma-frustrated and Marcus Rashford half-broken. Rasmus Hojlund is young and talented, but Manchester United tend to drag those types down over time rather than the vice versa. And all the while, it’s hard to see what the plan is to get the best out of them.

BRENTFORD, ENGLAND - MARCH 30: Manchester United's Casemiro applauds his side's travelling supporters at the end of the match during the Premier League match between Brentford FC and Manchester United at Gtech Community Stadium on March 30, 2024 in Brentford, England.(Photo by Andrew Kearns - CameraSport via Getty Images)
This is an even worse iteration of Man Utd than under Solskjaer (Photo: Getty)

“We showed resilience all through the game but in points of aggressiveness Brentford were better,” said Ten Hag afterwards – you could change the name of the opponent and play out the same record on repeat each time. “We should show more passion and desire at many moments in the game. When you don’t play well you still have to win and we did it almost – that is my big disappointment that we didn’t bring it over the line. There was spirit and there was fight but not enough.”

Is that not the ultimate damnation of Ten Hag? This supposed tactician and technician, who overachieved with Ajax, uses fight and passion and you-just-need-to-bleed-for-the-cause, those supposed stereotypes of the British firefighter manager, as his only playbook. It sounds a lot like a coach who has run out of ideas.

Read More: Ten Hag can’t survive this – Man Utd haven’t been this wretched in 50 years

West Ham

I sent the below tweet on 16 March when smarting from Forest’s 1-1 draw against Luton Town. I have since made this opinion a tenet of my personality.

Saturday lunchtime brought the most extreme and inglorious example of the breed I could ever have wished for, thanks to a master of the art. With a quarter of the game remaining, West Ham were 3-1 up at Newcastle.

Eddie Howe’s defence had been made up of a second-choice goalkeeper, a third-choice right-back, a left-back playing in central defence, a right-back playing at left-back and Fabian Schar, a natural central defender who was injured but having to play on. Howe then made attacking changes to leave even more space in behind, something West Ham had already exploited.

David Moyes chose to bring off his centre forward Michail Antonio, who had already scored by breaking a creaky offside trap, an brought on an unfit, out-of-form defensive midfielder with a handful of appearances over the last two years and even fewer successful ones. West Ham then conceded three goals, at which point Moyes desperately brought on a striker.

It does not matter that Moyes didn’t feel that his team needed more goals. It matters that sitting back, when your opponent’s weakness was clearly in defence, when Newcastle only had a chance by building up a head of steam and when your own strength was your fluid attacking unit, was so obviously a foolish decision that every West Ham supporter was saying exactly the same thing. They joke amongst themselves that the best way to make life feel eternal is to watch West Ham defend a lead.

Saturday was an act of negligence from Moyes, victory turned into defeat because he couldn’t fight his own natural tendencies. When he’s angry after potentially not having his contract extended this summer, Moyes should remember days like these. It’s not good enough.

Newcastle

By Mark Douglas, i‘s northern correspondent

Newcastle United have momentum again in the chase for Europe but do they have the players? To the seven first teamers missing for this extraordinary defeat of West Ham, Eddie Howe can add four more who succumbed to injury or suspension on a chaotic, cathartic, season-saving afternoon. The club has since confirmed that Jamaal Lascelles suffered a torn ACL and will now miss up to nine months.

It is a trend that is concerning and confounding Newcastle insiders in equal measure. No team in the Premier League has lost more days to injury this season and there is a real sense of what might have been at the club if they hadn’t played most of this campaign without some of their star men.

An injury review will form part of Newcastle’s end of season debrief but no-one at the club believes there is a smoking gun to explain the problems. A combination of contact injuries, freak misfortune and general Premier League trends given the demands on players explain a lot of the problems.

And even in the cases where a deep dive would probably be helpful – like Sven Botman’s ACL injury – conflicting medical advice on his initial muscle tear means there is no straightforward explanation.

Brighton

By Pete Hall

He was bold, he was brash, but Roberto De Zerbi’s Anfield audition did little to convince a sceptical audience he has what it takes to succeed Jurgen Klopp as Liverpool manager. The Brighton boss set things up perfectly pre-match, insisting he is not sure where his future lies beyond this season, with Manchester United another potential destination.

Given his lack of experience at the very top level, the doubters needed to see something special from Brighton at Anfield, a lesson on par with that they put on at Old Trafford earlier this season. However, after Danny Welbeck did his duty as a Mancunian with an early opener, De Zerbi’s boldness went unrewarded.

With the Italian out to make an impression, he was not going to turn up to the audition empty handed, with a clear plan to target Liverpool’s inexperienced right hand side evident from the off.

Soccer Football - Premier League - Liverpool v Brighton & Hove Albion - Anfield, Liverpool, Britain - March 31, 2024 Brighton & Hove Albion manager Roberto De Zerbi REUTERS/Molly Darlington NO USE WITH UNAUTHORIZED AUDIO, VIDEO, DATA, FIXTURE LISTS, CLUB/LEAGUE LOGOS OR 'LIVE' SERVICES. ONLINE IN-MATCH USE LIMITED TO 45 IMAGES, NO VIDEO EMULATION. NO USE IN BETTING, GAMES OR SINGLE CLUB/LEAGUE/PLAYER PUBLICATIONS.
De Zerbi did not convince anyone of his Liverpool credentials (Photo: Reuters)

Welbeck’s sensational strike to silence Anfield started a trend. Time and again Jarell Quansah and Conor Bradley were engulfed by blue and white shirts – 62 per cent of all first-half Brighton attacks came down their left flank – and it was putting the hosts under a great deal of strain.

Salah’s early profligacy let the visitors off the hook, so De Zerbi remained unmoved, with Brighton passing out from the back at every single opportunity, even when faced with the Liverpool Gegenpressing machine. It was always a risky strategy, but one that can bring rewards for the bravest. Had Luis Diaz not nudged Liverpool level from a corner, a frustrated Anfield could have grown even more irritated.

Once Diaz had lifted the mood, however, there was only going to be one winner to leave Klopp beating his chest in front of the Kop once more. One man who could replace him, however, will have to really upset the apple cart for the remainder of the season to have any chance of getting the top job.

Wolves

It is a credit to Gary O’Neil that his Wolves side created more chances than Aston Villa in defeat and really should have taken the lead, but Wolves’ season will end with a whimper unless at least one of Matheus Cunha or Hwang Hee-chan can get fit and stay fit. No team in the Premier League is short of a goalscorer more than Wolves right now. The loss of Pedro Neto is one thing, but he wouldn’t have anyone to pass to if he was fit.

For the trip to Villa Park, O’Neil was choosing between Nathan Fraser, Leon Chiwome and Taranda Chirewa, aged 18, 19 and 20 and chronically short of the experience required to perform the task of leading the line in the Premier League. All three may well go on to have long EFL careers, but I’m not sure they will make it at Molineux and they desperately need loan moves.

The entire starting XI that Wolves started at Villa had scored fewer Premier League goals this season between them than Ollie Watkins has scored on his own. Sometimes you can’t atone for that type of hole in your team.

Chelsea

It’s not a question that is only being aimed towards Chelsea, but how long do you wait for a frustrating pattern to end before you conclude that the frustration itself is the norm rather than some weird aberration that will soon correct itself?

If a home draw against a Burnley team who will likely be relegated, despite having a man advantage for an hour and twice holding a lead, is the embodiment of your entire season in 90-odd minutes, you can be sure that the campaign itself has been a failure.

All the hallmarks were here. Chelsea had bags of chances but could not kill the game off – this was the second highest shot total by any winless team in a match in Europe’s top five leagues this season, after Liverpool’s 2-2 draw against Manchester United. They were eventually pulled back by their own defensive incompetence, as is standard.

They were also led by Cole Palmer, who now has 20 goal contributions (goals or assists) in the league this season and has been Chelsea’s best player of 2023-24 by such a distance that it should embarrass the rest. Palmer created five chances and had nine shots from midfield. If there is blame to be apportioned for this farcical campaign, Palmer has been a ray of bright light. This team does not deserve him.

With game management again being a problem, it’s the midfield that deserves the most censure. Chelsea’s central defenders – Axel Disasi and Benoit Badiashile – are not Mauricio Pochettino’s first choices and as such needed protection. He picked a central midfield trio of Enzo Fernandez, Conor Gallagher and Moises Caicedo that should, theoretically, offer bite and energy and positional awareness.

Statistics don’t always tell the full story, but Burnley had 18 shots at Stamford Bridge and were able to cut through Chelsea’s midfield on the break. So how on earth did Gallagher, Fernandez and Caicedo make one tackle and one interception between them in 223 combined minutes on the pitch?

Read more: Chelsea have been set up to fail – Pochettino should stop kidding himself

Fulham

Nobody is going to talk up much after Fulham joined Gillingham and Luton in the club of teams who have conceded three goals against Sheffield United this season. The fight shown to push for a point (and then look for a winner) after Marco Silva changed the system was impressive and Adama Traore again looked good as a substitute, but these are slapping lipstick on a pig after the defending that followed half-time.

It raises an interesting question. Fulham’s first-half performance, when they were the better team but failed to make it pay, smacked of a team that assumed it would win (OK, that’s not a nonsensical stance against Sheffield United).

Andreas Pereira played one trick pass that came across as arrogant at 0-0 and likely factored in their hosts adding a little more steel to their performance after half-time. These are things that wind Chris Wilder up.

This might be based purely on stereotype, but Fulham are the Premier League club you could most easily imagine coasting toward the end of a season with little to play for but pride, the first team on the beach.

After the intensity of the home win over Tottenham, it is extraordinary that Fulham were so different immediately after the international break. Silva will demand that to be corrected against Forest on Tuesday.

Bournemouth

Dominic Solanke will have been gutted to miss England duty during the international break. I – and probably he – can fully understand why Gareth Southgate deemed Solanke fourth in the queue behind Watkins (having a wonderful season) and Ivan Toney (takes a mean penalty, which may well be his best use at a major tournament).

In that position, the only thing a player can do is try to use the rest of the season to change his international manager’s thoughts and hope (although they would deny it strenuously) that a cruel twist of fate befalls a rival for the same role. The increase to 26-man squads, now back on the agenda, would also help his case.

Against Everton on Saturday, Solanke scored his 16th Premier League goal of the season to move third on the list of the division’s top scorers. Not only does this make 2023-24 the second most prolific league season of Solanke’s career (and the other two in the top three were in the second tier), it also makes him the joint-top goalscorer for Bournemouth in a top-flight campaign.

After the win, Andoni Iraola said that Bournemouth have “nine more chances” to secure the best league season by position in their history (they are four points behind ninth, their previous best). The same is true of Solanke. If he reaches 20 Premier League goals and then goes beyond that number, it will be hard to leave him out.

Crystal Palace

The current age of Profit and Sustainability Rules (PSR) controversy has led to arguments that, as is now tradition in football, will never cease and will never lead to widespread agreement. One undeniable certainty is that clubs outside the financial elite, without large annual revenues to prop up transfer market overreaching, have to be smart with their scouting and recruitment.

That might not be fair: the biggest clubs typically have the biggest budgets and scouting networks and can simultaneously afford to make the most mistakes. But it doesn’t change the reality. Your signings have to work out and have resale value. You have to identify early, buy low and sell high.

So we should congratulate Crystal Palace on their work in the January transfer window on early evidence. They moved to sign 19-year-old central midfielder Adam Wharton from Blackburn for a fee of around £18m and bought experienced 27-year-old right-back (or right wing-back) Daniel Munoz from Genk in Belgium’s Pro League.

Both have fitted in seamlessly. Wharton is a ball-winning midfielder but also a player who, in time, looks like he will be capable of picking passes quarterback style from a deeper-lying position, collecting the ball from the same central defenders as he is protecting. Munoz is a right-back scamperer, continually looking to overlap and provide crosses. When Michael Olise is back fit, he might be able to stay more central as a result with Eberechi Eze doing the same off the left.

It’s a credit to Oliver Glasner too. He’s not been here long and these weren’t his signings, but he already looks like a coach capable of improving the players he inherits rather than/as well as demanding investment in others. That’s the other trick to avoiding PSR complication: making you squad look deeper because you’re improving everyone by several percentage points.

Brentford

The positive spin (and this probably deserves to be the headline conclusion) is that Brentford created so many chances against Manchester United and they fought back even after conceding late to earn a point. It should have been all three, given their domination.

BRENTFORD, ENGLAND - MARCH 30: Brentford's Ivan Toney looks on at the end of the match during the Premier League match between Brentford FC and Manchester United at Gtech Community Stadium on March 30, 2024 in Brentford, England.(Photo by Andrew Kearns - CameraSport via Getty Images)
Toney summed up Brentford’s wastefulness (Photo: Getty)

It is an incredible statistic: Brentford had 31 shots on Saturday night. Not only is that their highest in a Premier League match by some distance, it’s the most that they have managed in a game in any competition since beating Blackpool 4-0 in the Championship in February 2015. It pushes an EFL Cup win against AFC Wimbledon in August 2017 in second place.

For all the positivity, though, this inevitably becomes a tale of attacking wastage, personified by Ivan Toney. Toney may have become the first Brentford player ever to score for England with his penalty against Belgium, but his lack of recent goals at club level is becoming an issue.

Over his last six league games, Toney has taken 19 shots without scoring. This is not all on him (it’s also useful examine the quality of chances that Toney had within his nine shots against United), but he’s underperforming his xG and is stopping Brentford from getting full value for their spells of attacking dominance. It would be helpful for his England chances if it clicked again soon.

Everton

Before Saturday, there were Everton supporters who had already turned on Sean Dyche. After Saturday, there are far fewer who now have any faith in him. This has been a difficult, topsy-turvy season that would have given most managers a headache, but the charge now stands that Dyche is highlighting Everton’s myriad issues on and off the pitch, not masking them. Even if Everton do stay up, most now hope this relationship ends there.

Everton are on the worst run of any Premier League club. They last won a league game on 16 December, taking five points from a possible 36 available. They have faced Wolves, Fulham, Crystal Palace, West Ham and now Bournemouth across that run. If the initial points deduction caused a swell of siege mentality created by supporters and used as fuel by Dyche, that tank has now run dry.

If asked to detail Everton’s problems on the pitch, the appropriate response would be to frown and then wave your right arm in a sweeping motion in front of your body to convey the breadth of the decay. That might soon include a takeover by the only obvious bidder and the potential apocalypse option all rolled in one. Still, good news about the new stadium.

But let’s settle on a micro problem. Since that win at Burnley in December, when Everton scored twice in the first 25 minutes to kill off the match at source, they have played 12 first halves. They have scored two goals in those first halves, one by Jack Harrison in a 3-1 defeat to Manchester City and the other by Harrison against Tottenham when they conceded two first-half goals anyway.

Only Sheffield United have scored fewer than Everton’s 11 first-half Premier League goals this season. They have been appalling at stamping their authority on matches and supporters believe – with good reason – that is a direct result of Dyche’s style of play.

Nottingham Forest

Out of the bottom three, but Forest missed one of their better chances to pull clear of trouble and as such remain deep in the mess. Their survival last season was defined by Steve Cooper’s ability to drag home wins out of the fire after Forest had been soundly beaten away. Nuno’s Forest are competitive in more matches, but the statistics are hardly emphatic in his favour. Cooper was sacked after taking 0.82 points per game this season. Nuno is taking 0.92 points per game and that includes six from his first three in charge.

I wonder if Saturday’s draw against Crystal Palace might prompt a change in Nuno’s team selection, because I’m not the only one who thinks he’s getting a couple of things wrong. The second half, before and during which Nuno made changes for the better, must now be the blueprint.

Firstly, Ibrahim Sangare may be a fine signing (although a lot is going to have to change to make £30m seem like value for money), but he is being carried in central midfield and Forest cannot afford that. Nico Dominguez has performed far better this season. Even Danilo, although ostensibly less of a No. 6 than Sangare, merits a place over the Ivorian on current form.

Secondly, and I cannot stress this enough, Divock Origi is not a winger. Forest tried this last season, farming Emmanuel Dennis out on the left and then acting surprised when he toiled and eventually failed.

If Origi is not good enough or suitable to start up front over Chris Wood (and he isn’t), he shouldn’t be crowbarred into the team for it’s own sake. Forest have wingers in Anthony Elanga and Gio Reyna who must be worth a go instead.

Finally, Morgan Gibbs-White is Forest’s best player and the plan has been to use him as a No 20 – fair enough. But when Forest struggle to progress the ball through midfield without losing it, Gibbs-White just gets isolated and sees far too little of the ball. Having him deeper (as in the second half on Saturday) would allow him to carry the ball forward and avoid getting so frustrated.

Luton

This is not really intended as criticism because Luton are operating on a different financial plane to most in the Premier League and have performed far beyond the preseason expectations of most (although that is now slightly reverting to the mean, given that Luton have 22 points from 30 matches). But the elements of chaos that make their matches so watchable are now starting to catch up with them.

Luton seem to play in one gear, from minute one to minute 90 and regardless of the match situation. Again, that’s a compliment to an extent, particularly when Luton have scored so frequently against the biggest teams in the division. Defeats to clubs like Tottenham will not decide their fate.

LONDON, ENGLAND - MARCH 30: Luton Town's Cauley Woodrow and Jordan Clark at the end of the match during the Premier League match between Tottenham Hotspur and Luton Town at Tottenham Hotspur Stadium on March 30, 2024 in London, England.(Photo by Rob Newell - CameraSport via Getty Images)
Luton cannot hold onto a lead (Photo: Getty)

But there are two issues developing. The first is that Luton allow too many shots at their goal (and of too high quality) to avoid conceding goals in a volume that may well relegate them. They have faced 140 shots in their last seven league games having faced only 59 in their previous five.

Secondly, they are getting worse at holding onto leads. The last four times they have held one have only resulted in one point. Again, these were largely against high-profile opponents and show Luton’s ability to shock those teams early in matches, but it’s not a useful habit to pick up ahead of an easier run from next weekend onwards.

Final bit of misplaced negativity: the four games that will likely decide whether Luton stay up or not are home fixtures against Fulham, Bournemouth, Brentford and Everton. Not only did the reverse fixtures produce three defeats, Luton also lost at home to Burnley and Sheffield United.

Burnley

They have clearly been the beneficiaries of points deductions elsewhere (and that situation could improve further if Everton suffer another loss), but Burnley suddenly have their tails up. A club that seemed doomed to relegation, the only uncertainty whether they finished 19th or dead last, have found some form.

Vincent Kompany’s side have taken five points from their last three games – it would have been more without West Ham’s late equaliser. That’s as many as they took from their previous 11 league games. They are only four points from safety, albeit with a dismal goal difference that adds on an extra half point.

On Saturday, a new side to Burnley away from home. Before Chelsea, Burnley had trailed in nine of their away league games this season. Their total return from those matches? No points and no obvious stomach for the fight. Here they were reduced to 10 men and yet still twice fought back from a goal down and fully merited their draw.

The even better news? Burnley’s next four matches are against Wolves (h), Everton (a), Brighton (h) and Sheffield United (a). They probably need to win at least two of those to give themselves a chance (Manchester United, Newcastle and Tottenham come thereafter), but to even have a chance at all epitomises both their mini-fightback and the low general quality of the Premier League’s bottom five.

Sheffield United

The disappointment at allowing 4-1 (before a VAR intervention) to become a 3-3 draw will not dissipate when supporters look at the league table. Believe or not, Sheffield United still had a chance of staying up when they held that lead and Forest trailed – they would have been only four points behind Forest with a game in hand. That chance has probably been extinguished since.

The other great “what if?” of Sheffield United’s season is what might have happened if Ben Brereton Diaz had stayed fit since his January loan move from Villarreal. Brereton Diaz made his debut on 21 January, got injured on 3 February and subsequently missed more than a month of football.

Here are two instructive statistics to make the point: 1) Brereton Diaz is Sheffield United’s joint-top league goalscorer from open play and he’s played 348 minutes; 2) Sheffield United have scored 27 league goals this season – 37 per cent of those goals have come in the five matches Brereton has played.



from Football - inews.co.uk https://ift.tt/FJAM3jU

Newcastle United have momentum again in the chase for Europe but do they have the players?

To the seven first teamers missing for this extraordinary defeat of West Ham, Eddie Howe can add four more who succumbed to injury or suspension on a chaotic, cathartic, season-saving afternoon. The club has since confirmed that Jamaal Lascelles suffered a torn ACL and will now miss up to nine months.

It is a trend that is concerning and confounding Newcastle insiders in equal measure. No team in the Premier League has lost more days to injury this season and there is a real sense of what might have been at the club if they hadn’t played most of this campaign without some of their star men.

An injury review will form part of Newcastle’s end of season debrief but no-one at the club believes there is a smoking gun to explain the problems.

A combination of contact injuries, freak misfortune and general Premier League trends given the demands on players explain a lot of the problems.

Mid-season analysis has been carried out by the club to try and identify any red flags but so far it’s understood the data backs up Howe’s belief that most of the issues are simply down to “bad luck”.

And even in the cases where a deep dive would probably be helpful – like Sven Botman’s ACL injury – conflicting medical advice on his initial muscle tear means there is no straightforward explanation.

It is not for a want of trying or investment. Newcastle are clients of Orreco, a data firm who specialise in bio makers that identify red flags through things like spotting inflammation enzymes in regular pinprick blood tests.

Players are protected, even if they are also expected to meet the demands of Howe’s intense style.

“I’ve never known a season like it,” Anthony Gordon, Newcastle’s dynamic driving force, said after Saturday’s win.

“It’s been crazy with people going off all the time. Every time someone goes down I’m immediately thinking the worst.”

Europe – either through catching Manchester United in fifth or hauling back a dazed West Ham in seventh – remains eminently possible but first they need to think about more practical matters. With three defenders and a goalkeeper ruled out through injury, simply pulling together a squad to face Everton on Tuesday night might be a challenge.

Even Gordon – at the centre of so much of what Newcastle did well once again – wasn’t immune, picking up a late second booking for kicking the ball away that left him somewhat incredulous. It will mean he’s kicking his heels for the visit of his former club in midweek.

“It’s incredible really, to get sent off for tapping a ball five yards,” he told i afterwards.

“I only think he [referee Rob Jones] booked me because he didn’t know he’d booked me already. That’s not good enough to be honest with you.

“I don’t want to complain about referees because they have a job to do. They are the rules so he’s sticking to the rules and laws of the game but it’s ridiculous really.”

That red came after a frantic, famous comeback at St James’ Park, a result of serious significance both for Newcastle and Howe – who has come under some external pressure for failing to address some of his team’s issues.

Instead Harvey Barnes’ brilliant cameo – as opposed to Kalvin Phillips’ disaster class when he came on for West Ham – saved Newcastle’s season and gave Howe much-needed breathing space.

“Beating [West Ham] in this game was a massive start for us because the season probably relied on Saturday’s result,” Gordon said.

“It can be a massive momentum shift for us and them, hopefully. The performance at 3-1 down to show that sort of heart, character and keep doing what we work on was unbelievable. At this point in the season, with where we stand in the league it’s a massive win.”

Struggling Everton would have felt like perfect opponents for Gordon, who left 14 months ago under something of a cloud.

“Missing a game is going to be a killer for me, I just want to keep playing,” he said.

“I don’t want this form and this feeling to go away. It’s going to be difficult watching from the stands but like I said I’m confident in the players around me.

“Obviously playing my old club I feel like I’m in a good place and I’m in good form. I don’t want to miss any games but that game specifically I wanted to play in. I’m confident we’ll still win the game anyway.”



from Football - inews.co.uk https://ift.tt/FBxgKUj

Were Manchester United’s new hierarchy to consult Jamie Redknapp, Erik ten Hag might be gone before Thursday’s fixture at Chelsea. United made Brentford look like Real Madrid, he said, in a scathing analysis of a performance as bad as any in the post Fergie era.

Indeed, this was a display that touched the post-Busby nadir of wretchedness when first Wilf McGuiness and then Frank O’Farrell tried and failed to negotiate the end of empire. Like Ten Hag, O’Farrell appeared to be making progress, even steering United back to the top of the league for the first time in three years before the structural issues of the day began to reassert themselves.

O’Farrell was eventually sacked 18 months into his tenure with United third from bottom. In swept Tommy Docherty with the radical reforms that would eventually return United to something like themselves, but not without suffering the ignominy of relegation in 1974. The penalty for failing has shifted since. Missing out on the Champions League is the tipping point for brand leaders like United now, and this awful outing in west London just about draws a line under Ten Hag’s ambitions in that regard.

If Ten Hag thinks that ungenerous, he should have been sat in the stands listening to the testimony of the Brentford fans, who could barely believe the transformation in a team that had won only twice in the previous 18 matches. To paraphrase, there was only one team playing football, only one team trying to win, and it wasn’t United.

Ten Hag acknowledged this himself, noting how Brentford were more aggressive, had more energy, more desire and won more second balls. Yet in questioning his team he failed to connect the part he played in delivering this outcome. United are his team. These are his players. How they perform is his responsibility.

Save for Raphael Varane, who did not make the second half, and Andre Onana, none emerged with any credit. We can excuse Kobbie Mainoo, who looked to be carrying the effects of the illness that made him a doubt and was substituted in the second half. It seemed a cruelty to keep Marcus Rashford on the pitch so ill equipped was he for the night. Whatever is ailing Rashford it appears to be evading detection among the coaching staff, who kept him on for 80 minutes.

As the Richarlison example instructs us, it would be unwise to jump to conclusions about Rashford’s form given the mental health concerns raised by his mother following the deaths of a close friend and a cousin. However, it is clear the player is slowed by something. Assuming he is physically fit, the issue lies elsewhere. Rashford was pronounced in his preference for walking, not running, for passing responsibility as well as the ball to the next man.

Redknapp claimed that the players have stopped playing for Ten Hag. This is, of course, the one step away from the nuclear conclusion, the point of no return, the lost dressing room. It is impossible to know for those on the outside looking in. All we can do is to look for clues on the pitch. And the evidence was damning at Brentford, as it has been for much of the season home and away.

The idea that the FA Cup victory over Liverpool before the international break represented some kind of Rubicon crossed was torpedoed in a game that United could easily have lost by the same 4-0 score that did for them on their last visit to the Gtech Community Stadium. Brentford hit the frame of the goal three times and had an Ivan Toney goal disallowed by a fractional VAR transgression.

The 31 shots that peppered United’s goal were the most amassed by Brentford in seven years. Only Sheffield United and Luton have a higher average of shots per game conceded than United. Ten Hag has fashioned a team without personality or pattern. The nearest they came to coherence was the punt up the pitch by Onana, a stratagem revealed straight from the kick-off when Bruno Fernandes passed the ball back directly to Onana, who duly walloped it into orbit.

This 1970s signature contrasted with the speed and movement that characterised Brentford’s approach once the ball returned to earth. Whatever the strengths of United’s front three on Saturday, Rashford, Rasmus Hojlund and Alejandro Garnacho competing for balls in the air against 6ft 5ins Kristoffer Ajer and 6ft 4ins Nathan Collins is not among them. Brentford pounced on the second balls and off they went.

On the touchline Ten Hag filled his notebook purposefully. He might just as easily have perused prior entries since the passive, shapeless nature of this ensemble is well established. And he is the author of it. He cannot identify failings in attitude and application of the players without taking his share of responsibility.

His opposite number, Thomas Frank, mentioned among others in the growing list of possible replacements for Ten Hag, had a back four entirely unavailable here, yet the stand-ins had the United attack in their pockets. And in possession his team was quick, mobile and incisive. Perhaps the man to lead United next season was on view on Saturday night, after all.



from Football - inews.co.uk https://ift.tt/rNC1cks

Kalvin Phillips‘ unhappy loan stint at West Ham hit a new low after he was caught on camera in an angry exchange with fans following Saturday’s 4-3 defeat by Newcastle.

The England international has struggled to find form since arriving from Manchester City in January.

He gave away a disputed penalty shortly after coming off the bench at St James’ Park and completed just three of nine attempted passes.

The Hammers were 3-1 up when the midfielder was brought on in the 69th minute but Alexander Isak’s second successful spot-kick of the match and a brace from Harvey Barnes won it for the Magpies.

In a video shared on social media, fans can be heard shouting “useless” and “get out [of our club]” as Phillips boards the team coach after the game.

Once inside the vehicle, Phillips is clearly seen through the windscreen raising his middle finger in the direction of the fans. West Ham have declined to comment on the incident.

Hammers manager David Moyes said of his decision to bring Phillips on in the second half: “I thought an extra midfield player would give us a bit more control in the middle of the pitch at that time. But obviously it didn’t work.

“At the time, I felt that they were slightly the better team. We were 2-1, we got 3-1 but from that point onwards, we needed to defend well and be stronger and be harder to play against.”



from Football - inews.co.uk https://ift.tt/JvsN8nu

Everton’s third FFP hearing of the season took place in the first three days of last week, with i reporting a decision on the outcome could be announced as early as this week.

The Toffees have already been deducted six points this season for breaching the Premier League’s profit and sustainability rules (PSR), reduced from 10 on appeal.

And they may well now face a further deduction after admitting to another breach, this time over the period 2019-2023.

i spoke to a football finance expert to find out what Everton’s second hearing verdict could be and what it means for the relegation battle.

Three possible outcomes of Everton’s FFP hearing

Everton’s second hearing is probably the most predictable of the season so far, whether the decision reached is reasonable or not.

The Toffees’ first case was marred by the uncertainty of uncharted waters, Nottingham Forest’s heavily impacted by an adjusted loss limit and Brennan Johnson, but this case is unique in that three-quarters of it has already been penalised.

Due to the impact of Covid-19, Everton’s first breach spanned 2019-2022, their second 2019-2023.

On one hand, this feels unfair, a classic case of double jeopardy, but on the other it will mean some will consider their second breach all the more egregious. If Everton knew they were going to breach in the first instance, doing it again will draw inevitable accusations of recklessness and impunity.

Unlike in Everton’s first case, there are now loose benchmarks in place for how PSR breaches will be penalised.

The Forest report agreed with Everton’s appeal report that a three-point deduction is the standard acceptable starting point for a “significant” breach of PSR, with points added on from there for scale. Alongside this, it is clear from the Forest report that the Premier League believe a points deduction is the only acceptable punishment for PSR breaches.

Both Everton’s 2019-2022 breach of £19.5m and Forest’s of £34.5m were judged to be worth three points on top of the initial three, so six in total. Forest then received two points back as mitigation for cooperating with the Premier League.

This provides a relatively clear framework for how Everton will be punished. Despite what the club will believe is a strong case for mitigation on the basis of double jeopardy, the independent commission are likely to start from a basis of around six points, unless the Toffees’ breach is significantly lower than it was in 2019-2022, which seems highly unlikely.

There are three possible outcomes here. The first, and least likely, is that the independent commission believes Everton have already been punished for the majority of this period, and only recommend a financial penalty. Given the Premier League’s previous assertion that points deductions are the only acceptable punishment for PSR breaches, this seems highly unlikely.

Everton are likely to receive a second points deduction for breaching financial rules (Photo: Getty)

The second option is a penalty as significant as Everton were initially prescribed in their first case, a deduction of six points or above. Given the club’s previous punishment, this also seems reasonably impractical and would be viewed as draconian as best.

This leaves the final option of a smaller points deduction, the outcome football finance expert Dr Rob Wilson believes is most likely.

“We will hear something very similar to what we got with Forest,” Wilson tells i. “It might be a six-point deduction reduced to four, with the reduction to four will be because of the crossover of the PSR periods, the double jeopardy situation. They’ve still breached, but they’re going in the right direction with regards to PSR for the next period. I’m expecting four.

“On the basis they’ve breached they’ll get three, then it will be determined by the size of the breach and the negotiation from there.

“On the basis that the charge is being heard, you get a sense of confidence that the Premier League are sure from the submission of information that Everton provided in advance of Christmas that there is a breach of some description, so three points would be the minimum. They’re drawing a pretty hard line in the sand to clubs in the face of the independent regulator.”

When will Everton know if further points have been deducted

Everton will know the result of this third hearing by 8 April at the latest, but as i reported recently, they could hear the outcome as early as this week.

But this outcome may well not be the end of Everton’s PSR nightmare this season, as they will then be able to appeal whatever punishment is initially given to them.

The Premier League have identified Friday 25 May as a backstop date for any appeal for both Everton and Forest’s cases to be wrapped up, although this falls five days after the final matches of the season.

How Everton’s FFP charge could affect the relegation battle

Everton are currently 16th in the Premier League, four points above Nottingham Forest in 18th.

If they were to receive the four-point deduction Wilson predicts, the Toffees would then drop to 17th, above Forest on goal difference.

Yet the uncertainty around both Forest and Everton will continue to have a significant impact on the relegation battle. Forest have already announced they will appeal their current punishment, with Everton likely to do the same if they’re given a further points deduction.

The Premier League has announced a backstop date of 25 May for these appeals to be concluded, the Friday after the final day of the season.

This means Everton could finish the season unsure whether they have done enough to ensure their top-flight survival.



from Football - inews.co.uk https://ift.tt/50BJGkV

The narrative demands that we focus upon the similarities between Pep Guardiola and Mikel Arteta, given their shared history. The master and apprentice dynamic has worn a little thin, but there is still a tactical genealogy that connects the two managers of two title challengers.

Whether Arteta took ideas from Guardiola, implemented them as his own at Arsenal or – as is surely most likely – they stemmed from communal work between the two and others during Arteta’s time in Manchester, it does not matter. The best learn from each other.

What’s more interesting is how Arteta has diverged from Guardiola’s principles and, in doing so, created a team that shares a general ethos with City whilst containing elements that Pep himself may look to implement.

The use of attacking set pieces

Arsenal have become the Premier League kings of the set-piece goal, their 18 three more than any other club and seven more than Manchester City. That’s owed, in part, to Arteta and his coaches maximising Arsenal’s effectiveness from corners. Given Guardiola often picks three natural central defenders and has Rodri and Erling Haaland, City’s record from corners has been slightly disappointing this season.

Arsenal’s plan is fairly simple. Of the 177 corners they have delivered straight into the box this season, 176 were inswingers. Not only do Manchester City take a far higher percentage of their corners (and free-kicks) short, they also have a much more even split between inswinging and outswinging deliveries.

The typical setup is this: Martin Odegaard runs out of the penalty area to offer a short option, taking a defender with him.

On the edge of the box, Bukayo Saka and a central midfielder (usually Jorginho or Kai Havertz) hang on the edge of the box to either collect a headed clearance or stop a counter. William Saliba runs from a central area to the front post, while Gabriel runs from beyond the back post to a position in front of the goal.

Quick transitions vs possession

There have been times this season when Arsenal’s attack has appeared a little slow, robotic even. They struggled to create chances during a defeat at Fulham and had a series of low-value opportunities during the 2-0 defeat to West Ham. Arteta had spoken about the need for dominance, but this was a bastardised version of it, process without result.

“The best way to describe it is that last season it was a bit ‘Jurgen Klopp Liverpool’ and this season it feels more like Manchester City,” said Jami Carragher on Sky Sports.

“There’s less transition, there’s more control which I think helps them defensively. But does it help them offensively? It made me wonder whether they are too organised in attack.”

It’s a really interesting point, because it suggests that Arteta is looking for a tactical evolution from Guardiola’s possession but one that stops short of Liverpool’s high-energy swirl. And since the turn of the year, I think we’ve seen that being perfected.

Manchester City have completed around 5,000 more passes than Arsenal in the league this season, but drill down into those numbers and you see the difference. Arsenal have played more passes into the penalty area and have played more progressive passes (those that move the ball significantly closer to goal). City carry the ball more towards goal; Arsenal tend to pass it there.

And you can tell as much when watching both teams at their best. For City, Bernardo Silva, Phil Foden and Jack Grealish (when fit) out wide tend to slow down the game deliberately, probing with sideways passing and looking for the slip of concentration that creates the gap and thus the chance. Arsenal’s wingers are the opposite, quick in transition and looking to get in behind.

There’s another statistic that epitomises this quite nicely. Arsenal have been caught offside 63 times this season, continuously looking to break the line and move from slow passing in their own third to quick flashes through midfield. Manchester City have been caught offside 29 times, fewer than any other club. Theirs is a game of precision and patience.

The wandering, multipurpose No 9

Given that Guardiola effectively sold Gabriel Jesus to Arsenal to accommodate the arrival of Erling Haaland, that reflected a tactical divergence between the two managers. Guardiola described Jesus as the best pressing striker in the world, but then signed the most obvious “presence” No 9 in the game.

Arteta has lurched back the other way. The biggest difference between the two coaches is now how they use the furthest player up the pitch.

Jesus and Eddie Nketiah have started 10 league games each this season, but neither have improved their standing since last August.

Instead, over the last six league games Arteta has used one of Leandro Trossard or Kai Havertz as his nominal centre forward and asked them to drift deep and wide into pockets of space.

Over that same run of matches, Arsenal have scored 26 goals and conceded three.

Whoever plays there drops deep and links play, often on the turn with midfielders rushing past them. At times, Arsenal’s 4-2-3-1 becomes a 4-3-1-2 with the three midfielders high and the two wingers, Saka and Martinelli playing as split strikers looking to get in behind.



from Football - inews.co.uk https://ift.tt/PlY6L3o

MKRdezign

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

copyright webdailytips. Powered by Blogger.
Javascript DisablePlease Enable Javascript To See All Widget