World news

Marcus Rashford has been open to it all along, but very few actually believed the Manchester United outcast would ever wear the shirt of his boyhood club again. Until now.

The i Paper has been told that Ineos are now focusing on bringing in at least two more midfielders this summer, which means they may not bring in another left-winger as originally planned.

Manuel Ugarte’s serious injury, suffered at the World Cup, has left Kobbie Mainoo and the incoming Ederson as the only two senior midfielders in the squad. Ugarte had been considered one of the players up for sale as part of a fundraising effort to strengthen other areas of the team.

To fill that gap, Rashford could be brought back into the camp. He is a forward reborn in Barcelona after his successful loan spell, with his impressive form continuing at the World Cup.

What next for Rashford?

Rashford is expected to return for pre-season training at Carrington after the World Cup, with sources close to the 28-year-old insisting he is open to starting again at United, where he has not fulfilled all his ambitions. Despite interest from Tottenham, Rashford does not want to play for another Premier League club.

United’s stance is where the issues present themselves. The club are aware Rashford will be returning later this month, but Ineos have made it very clear that they do not want to pay his £325,000-a-week wages.

Sir Jim Ratcliffe has identified the wage bill as a priority to trim. Two of the club’s other top earners, Jadon Sancho and Casemiro, have both gone last month.

Ideally, United would have sold Rashford and used the funds to invest in the squad – but their well-known reluctance to pay his wages doesn’t put them in a position of strength in the market, according to insiders.

With two years left on his deal, clubs are put off spending on a 28-year-old on such an expensive contract. It is understood that negotiating a lower wage structure will be difficult. Such deals don’t tend to happen too often.

United’s desperation to move him on will encourage big European sides to enquire about a loan. Barcelona and Bayern Munich are poised. Andre Onana has already been sent back out on loan to save on the wage bill.

Why are United having such a quiet window?

Another player whose wage demands put United off was Mateus Fernandes. Tottenham have agreed an £85m fee for the Portuguese midfielder – a bid United were simply not willing to match.

It is understood that Fernandes, in a deal brokered by super-agent Jorge Mendes, will earn around £250,000-a-week – 50,000 more than the next top earner at Spurs. United were not willing to offer anything like the same salary.

Read more

• Man Utd: Six summer transfer targets – with three players still for sale
• Kevin Garside: The World Cup has exposed all of Thomas Tuchel’s flaws

While there are still two months left of the summer transfer window, there is no panic around Old Trafford. Their transfer targets are dwindling in number by the week.

Adam Scott from Bournemouth is a top target, but he also could command a fee United are not looking to spend on one young player. Bournemouth are understood to be keen to tie him down to a new contract, one that is set to include a release clause.

Sandro Tonali is another top midfield option, but Manchester City are expected to make a big play for the Italian in the coming weeks. He is someone they see as the perfect partner for Elliot Anderson in the heart of their midfield.

from Football - The i Paper https://ift.tt/H7nbRQV

While some American politicians talk up their love for football in the spotlight of the World Cup, San Francisco’s Mayor is the real deal.

Daniel Lurie gets up early at weekends to watch live Premier League games and has now attended five World ⁠Cups, even lifting the trophy with former Brazil midfielder Gilberto Silva during a promotional tour this year.

Since this year’s tournament started, Lurie has been on a whistle-stop tour of San Francisco’s packed fan zones and bars during live matches, sleeves rolled up and mingling with boozy fans in pubs festooned with flags.

“I’ve been a huge soccer fan my whole life,” Lurie told the Reuters news agency.

“A lot of people are excited about ⁠the World Cup. I kind of live and die soccer,” he said, stopping the conversation briefly ​to ⁠get an update on Tuesday’s Brazil v Japan game, eventually won 2-1 by Brazil.

“So, for me, this isn’t just for this month. I get into soccer all year round.”

More than just a fan

There are six games in the San ​Francisco Bay ⁠Area in this World Cup, most notably on Thursday morning (BST), when the United States ‌play a round-of-32 match against Bosnia and Herzogovnia.

Lurie’s football links go beyond fandom. He is also an investor in 49ers Enterprises, the commercial arm of the San Francisco 49ers NFL team, which became majority owners of Scottish giants Rangers last year after taking over Leeds United in 2023.

“We are now ‌staying up again,” he said of Leeds. “We’ve got a long way to go to get ‌to that top six, to get into European competition, but I believe we can.”

Democratic moderate Lurie was elected San Francisco mayor in 2024, and before that was a philanthropist and an heir to the Levi Strauss fortune.

Lurie spent $US10.5 million (£7.9 million) of his own wealth on ⁠his campaign, according to disclosures, with the next biggest contributor his mother, Mimi Haas, a major Levi shareholder, who in 2021 had a net worth of $1.4 billion (£1 billion), according to Forbes.

The USA is taking on Australia in the second game of their World Cup campaign, and we’re bouncing around the city to catch the game. From The East Cut to China Basin Park Social, these spaces are bringing people together to celebrate the world’s game. Get out there, cheer on Team… pic.twitter.com/17nzxFe62x

— Daniel Lurie 丹尼爾·羅偉 (@DanielLurie) June 19, 2026

Social media sensation

Lurie has become a social media sensation in San Francisco, cultivating a man-of-the-people image with videos of him at farmers markets, officiating same-sex marriages, munching on Mexican food and handing out ice creams from a van.

His Instagram account has gone into overdrive during the World Cup, with posts of him sitting on the floor at watch parties and bouncing from pub to pub to see Lionel Messi’s double for Argentina against Austria, the US beating Australia, France v Senegal, and Ghana against Panama.

“We’re hitting every spot around the city,” he said. “It’s been electric. Our neighbourhoods ‌have been teeming with fans from around the world.”

Lurie last year persuaded US ​President Donald Trump to call off his planned federal surge of National Guard and Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents to San Francisco, ‌telling him his city was “on the rise” and ICE agents and ⁠troops would derail its recovery.

And Lurie hopes the World ‌Cup can provide a lasting legacy.

“We need things to unify us,” ​he said. “The World Cup here in North America and here in the San Francisco Bay Area is doing just that, bringing people together, uniting people. We need more of that.”

from Football - The i Paper https://ift.tt/cxFqOrk

KANSAS CITY — Declan Rice is seen as a bit of a joker. When you spend any time with him, he is open, jovial and can’t finish any sentence, no matter the subject, without a broad smile on his face.

There is a reason why many who know him refer to Rice as the “vibe controller” and, with Thomas Tuchlel’s preferred buzzword being “brotherhood”, such a facet is pivotal to England’s World Cup cause.

Rice’s ultra force of personality and impact on his teammates makes him almost impossible to leave out now he is back fit to face DR Congo. But there’s one burgeoning relationship that adds another layer to Rice’s acumen. One he is helping foster into something truly special.

“We had a great chat the other day,” Rice said of turning confidant for Manchester City-bound Elliot Anderson. “We sat outside on the beanbags. I just said to him that he can’t control the price that he’s going for.

‘One of the best’

“I couldn’t control what I went for, he can’t control what he’s going for. Why he’s going for that price is because he’s been one of the best players in Europe this season. I was trying to give him a bit of perspective that the price tag is just noise.”

Anderson’s £116m move to Manchester City is not confirmed yet, but it is as good as done. That means Tuchel could have three £100m midfielders available to him in one line-up given Rice and Bellingham’s own fees.

Bellingham excelled in a deeper role against Panama, in Rice’s absence through injury – a knock that was more of a dead leg than an actual calf problem.

While Tuchel may be tempted to go with something similar, deploying either Morgan Rogers or Eberechi Eze in a No 10 role ahead of Bellingham, Rice’s explanation of that telepathy developing between him and Anderson alone should be enough to force a rethink.

“He’s one of the best I’ve played with,” Rice continues. “If he doesn’t get the ball, he has a little dig at you because he wants it. I think our first nine to 10 months together have been amazing as a new partnership.

“Sometimes it’s hard because when you play against low blocks. I feel like as the games keep going on and teams become more expansive against us, you’ll keep seeing the best of me, El [Anderson], Jude, and the rest of the team. Those are the types of games we want because that’s what we’re used to at our clubs — being active, having really good rhythm on the pitch, and finding each other in good spaces. What we are good at.”

England’s generational force

While DR Congo will set up to contain rather than dictate in Atlanta, they will not set up as negatively as Carlos Queiroz did when Ghana needed only a point from last week’s group-stage clash.

While supporters were quick to lament England’s tepid display in Boston, with their anodyne approach continuing in the first half in New Jersey against Panama, breaking through stymied backlines has stumped some of the greatest footballing minds.

The lack of jeopardy in the group stage helped teams take such an approach, once they had a win under their belts. Unless you want to rely on penalties, knockout football naturally encourages more endeavour, even in small doses.

A midfield three of Rice, Anderson and Bellingham is a potentially generational force. Tuchel’s experiment of moving Bellingham forward to play off Harry Kane as a natural No 10 has not worked. A flatter 4-3-3 may just be that modus operandi.

Read more

• England: Three winners and three losers from the 2026 World Cup group games
• Daniel Storey: Seven reasons I just can’t work out this England team

Bellingham should play deeper, that much is clear. Yet with the level of understanding Anderson and Rice are developing, and the ostensible respect between the pair, his inclusion should not be at the expense of the Premier League winner.

England were occasionally vulnerable with only Anderson to protect the backline out of possession. That cannot be allowed to happen again. Rice solves that problem and can simultaneously do so without stifling England’s most potent weapon from deep.

And, in a team picked as much on the vibes as talent, there is nobody better at keeping England gunning for glory in their heads as well as their feet.

from Football - The i Paper https://ift.tt/nNwojq2

ATLANTA — The Americans weren’t ever going to let the opportunity pass. Football is steeped in tradition, everywhere but here. Carte blanche.

Soccer is gaining in popularity by the second in the United States. And with pride in one’s home inescapable in the land of the free, the opportunity to educate the world in the American way was always going to be impossible to resist.

Whether the Americanisation of the World Cup is intentional or not, it is inescapable.

American national anthem, no matter who is playing

It does not quite leave as sour a taste as the Saudi Arabia national anthem being played out at Wembley during the boxing, but when we are asked to stand for “The Star-Spangled Banner” an hour before kick-off, often to a near-empty stadium, we are simply left asking “why”?

What place does the US anthem have ahead of an encounter between two teams from the other side of the world?

The audacity of the stadium announcers to instruct people to stand for it only adds to the impudence of it all. God bless America.

Those blasted hydration breaks

Even the Canadians booed. Hydration breaks are perhaps understandable in 35-degree heat, but in air-conditioned stadiums with the roof closed?

What they cram into those three minutes tells you all you need to know about the real motives. Like a sped-up Super Bowl half-time show, twice per game.

The flow of the match is the real loser in all of this. Any team that is on top immediately has the momentum sapped out of them when forced to stop for three minutes – which is kind of what any game plan contrives to conjure in the first place.

Make. Some. Noise and countdown to kick-off

We are one step away from kiss-cam stealing the show. Perhaps the Premier League could benefit from competitions to measure the noise generated by supporters of each team? Or would riots ensue? How partisan would the judges be?

Panning to the crowd in American sport and urging spectators to dance works – some good old family fun. When England fans were picked out in Boston, their time in the spotlight was short-lived, given their choice of gesture.

One Americanism that does make you wince are those countdowns to kick-off, like we are bringing in the New Year around Sydney Harbour. Rather than any fireworks being let off, the whole spectacle doesn’t work when upon the countdown climax, Declan Rice passes the ball all the way back to the goalkeeper.

Picking out stars of other sports mid-match

Imagine sitting in Old Trafford and Luke Littler appears on the big screen, looking rather uncomfortable as he waves for a period of time longer than he ever has had to before, while the crowd goes wilder than at any other point in the match.

Over here, the stadium screens regularly pick out NFL or NBA stars, which startles us foreign reporters, given we often have no idea who they are.

Can’t they be left to watch the greatest sporting spectacle on earth in peace?

Jingoistic stadium announcers

Stadium announcers here all sound exactly like Michael Buffer, without the hyperbole. Do they all go to the same language school and yodel until they can opine Let’s Get Ready to Rumble in that unmistakable chutzpah?

And you just know they have paid very little attention to the things that really matter, like getting players’ names right.

Let’s hope Noni Madueke was not listening to his starting berth being revealed for England’s opener, the proudest moment of his career, when the AT&T Stadium compere got into all kinds of trouble.

Fans sitting together a risky game?

I know Netherlands versus Japan is hardly Millwall against West Ham, but have Fifa become too American and completely forgotten about any form of segregation between supporters?

One set of supporters sit at one end and the others opposite.

Imagine if England and Russian supporters had been seated side by side in Marseille? And does it not just look better – this is your end and that ours? This is soccer, people.

Everything is massive

It is just so unnecessary. We know size matters in America more than anything, with football supporters not left out of their penchant for the gargantuan.

Big screens in stadiums are cinema size and tempt you into gazing lovingly at them rather than the pitch down below. Bars on concourses have mini-stadium seating next to them. Parking lots stretch further than the eye can see.

The inspiration behind the AT&T Stadium wasn’t the Maracana or the Nou Camp, but the Pyramids. The biggest structure Americans could think of, of course.

Read more

• Kevin Garside: The World Cup has exposed all of Thomas Tuchel’s flaws
• Daniel Storey: German football is a bin fire – only one man can save them

Popcorn smell overwhelms

In Spain, it’s pipas and marijuana. In Germany it’s wheat beer. In the US, it’s popcorn.

The smell of World Cup stadiums over here evokes memories of family trips to Disney World, where any enclosed space reeked of popcorn.

The hot food prices over here are so eyewatering you can’t blame the locals for filling up on a cinema’s staple snack. Is there a smell more American than that?

from Football - The i Paper https://ift.tt/6GfygCN

Hey, maybe losing in the most painful way imaginable was a blessing in disguise? Had Germany scraped through and been beaten by France in the last-16, the DFB may have been able to persuade themselves that the team was mere fractions away from being competitive.

Perhaps they might even have claimed that the scent of progress could be detected in the wind. After two group-stage eliminations at World Cups, at least we won a tie here. And we only lost to Spain in extra-time two years ago, guys. Probably that’s what Jonathan Tah was thinking as he hoofed his penalty back over the Atlantic Ocean.

Germany cannot escape their own reflection now. The only thing worse than not playing knockout matches at World Cups is playing them as heavy favourites and being humiliated. And they lost on penalties at a World Cup for the first time too, so the stereotyped jokes at the expense of others don’t even work anymore.

This is a national emergency for the DFB. Their team will go at least 16 years without ranking in the top 16 of any World Cup tournament. Once they were giants, then champions, then contenders and now has-beens and when-will-they-be-agains. The list of nations to win a knockout tie since them: Canada, Russia, Sweden, Morocco, Croatia.

When Germany hit their nadir at Euro 2000, it prompted a systemic overhaul of the production line of technical footballers and of the coaching pathways that allowed the talent to flourish. That is not needed now. The under-21 group is strong. This is not the end of Germany’s academy revolution.

In a way, that makes it worse. In 2000 there was a shopping list; blueprints had been created and timeframes agreed. Then there was things to do and smiling, eager faces to do them. What about when it’s just an uninspiring team doing uninspiring things?

This is now an environment where the shine of youth is dimmed before it can make the room itself brighter. Watch Jamal Musiala and Florian Wirtz during this tournament and try to disagree.

At the same time, Germany are between eras. Manuel Neuer is 40 and shouldn’t have been here at all; it was a dim mistake from Julian Nagelsmann. Antonio Rudiger is 33, Joshua Kimmich 31 and Leroy Sane 30. Those four outfielders could make the next European Championship at a push, but is the longer-term plan not the right one now?

Watching Germany on Monday evening – and I’ll happily concede that this brings me some degree of pleasure to write – reminded me of England against Iceland at Euro 2016. The older players look weary. The younger players look overawed. The rest just look wholly beaten up by the experience itself, as if ignominy has become fated. Germany are in their England 2006-2016 age here.

Nagelsmann will surely be sacked – how can he not be and the DFB still call this a culture of excellence? Still just 38, his career is at a crossroads but he is not the only one who may feel better away from this bin fire rather than being burned by it. There’s a guy at Barcelona who could probably offer some thoughts on that.

On the Road USA

Join Daniel Storey on his 7,200-mile odyssey across the US to tell the stories of a World Cup like no other.

Sign up to his free newsletter here and get it delivered to your inbox throughout the tournament.

The obvious answer is Jurgen Klopp, who has spent this tournament offering punditry that often strayed – understandably – into what he might do differently as Germany head coach. It makes sense. Again like England in 2016, German players have forgotten what enjoying playing for your country is like. The pressure is too much. The punishment for losing has more mental real estate than the reward for winning.

Klopp is also no guarantee. You cannot see off the long-term manager, the Bayern Munich and Barcelona supercoach and the nation’s next big thing and expect certainty. That is the true price of repeated failure: the shape of your reputation shifts and warps against you.

Germany are not what you remember, merely ghosts of glorious history. The muscle memory of winning is no more. Muller, Schweinsteiger, Lahm, Kroos, Neuer – the last one fell upon his sword in Foxborough and there are few male heirs to continue the bloodline. Es tut mir leid – you’re just not special anymore.

from Football - The i Paper https://ift.tt/klVM21O

Thomas Tuchel is perched upon a set of scales, the balance edging up or down depending on the competence of his England team.

Right now he appears no more secure in the minds of the supporters than his predecessor Gareth Southgate. The mess surrounding some of his selections, particularly at full-back, suggest he may have slipped below the levels of supporter confidence enjoyed by Southgate, which is a worry since he was appointed as the anti-Gareth.

The authority he brought to the piece, the notion of Tuchel as an elite technician, the authoritative coach shaped by superior continental ideas, survives by the narrowest of margins and could be erased completely should the Democratic Republic of Congo exhibit the same athleticism and vigour in the round of 32 as their African neighbours Ghana did in the group stage.

The African resurgence may have been facilitated to an extent by the bloated 48-team format. Nevertheless, nine teams progressing to the last 32 suggests the continent’s structural and organisational impediments are no longer holding back its talent. And most feel this tie is anything but straightforward.

Tuchel’s selections have exposed the flaws to which, ultimately, all coaches are vulnerable; prejudice, favouritism, chemistry, the impulses that complicate selections. We convince ourselves that the decisions we make are value free, in the best interests of the group, but in reality Tuchel is responding subjectively in choosing one player above another.

This would account for the inclusion of Reece James at right-back, a footballer made of balsa, at the expense of Trent Alexander-Arnold, who offsets questionable defence with next-level distribution. The selection of Tino Livramento, another with a delicate frame, compounded the James mistake.

Ironically, the one specialist right-back remaining, Djed Spence, was deployed by Tuchel at left-back against Ghana to answer the incomplete performance of Nico O’Reilly against Croatia. This made the exclusion of Lewis Hall and Luke Shaw even harder to comprehend and emulated Southgate’s puzzling preference for Kieran Tripper at left-back, which compromised England’s attacking threat down the left without necessarily enhancing defence.

The injury to Jarell Quansah was plain unlucky, but its significance has been magnified by Tuchel’s indifference to Alexander-Arnold and infatuation with James. Favouritism has clearly impacted the middle of the park in a similar way following injury to Declan Rice.

Jordan Henderson is the ultimate luxury item, included more as a bonding agent than a front-rank midfielder. Rice’s creaking hamstring forced the selection of Jude Bellingham in the deeper No 8 role, a happy dose of serendipity via which Tuchel at least established his most effective position and camouflaged the poverty of output on the wings.

Read more

• John Barnes: I played football with Marvin Gaye in my garden
• Daniel Storey: I paid £12 for a disgusting World Cup stadium hot dog – and had a food epiphany

Surveys of fan opinion reveal a growing disconnection between Tuchel’s world view and theirs. The James fiasco is uppermost, revealing universal disbelief that Alexander-Arnold is not there. The calls for Phil Foden, Cole Palmer and Jarrod Bowen are also growing following the flat contributions of a one-dimensional Anthony Gordon, inconsistent Marcus Rashford and erratic Noni Madueke.

And few can fathom Ivan Toney’s inclusion among the cohort of strikers. Being good at penalties nowhere near justifies it in the eyes of the majority.

None of this will matter should Tuchel be the coach shaking the presidential hands of Donald Trump and Gianni Infantino on 19 July. If not, the hit to his reputation could be terminal, or at least a tax he must pay for the remainder of his career.

from Football - The i Paper https://ift.tt/q6Fg45X

KANSAS CITY — The hot dog is fairly disgusting by any measure other than football stadium hot dogs, where it ranks medium to low. There is some colour on the sausage, but biting into it releases an escape of boiling water that frankly tests my gag reflex. The bun, which three seconds ago was dry verging on very dry, is now soggy in large patches. 

It’s the size that really makes me laugh. In English stadiums the rollover hotdog has become a thing (rough translation: long frankfurter in a slightly pappy baguette), but this is a “Junior”, aka the rollover’s baby cousin. The entire thing is less than double the length of the small sauce sachet provided. It’s a three-biter, to use a phrase that I’ll probably leave on the shelf in future.

The price is a joke too, even if I sort of knew that was coming. I went “junior” for that reason. I add a reasonable tip (I’m British, it takes two extra steps not to add a tip and I’m medically scared of anyone thinking bad of me, even someone who I’ll never see again). It takes the purchase to $15.56 (£11.78), or £3.93 per bite. The mustard sachet was free, because this World Cup is truly determined to give back to fans.

Prices being overinflated at this tournament is hardly breaking news, but it’s on the stadium food that it really comes into its own. You can argue against lofty ticket costs, but the World Cup is at least a very captive market and an elite sporting environment. Paying 12 quid for a crap, small hotdog is less cool.

I had other options: the £9 pretzel or three-quarters of a pint of beer for £16.80, perhaps (plus tip). Nor is Arrowhead, Kansas City the most expensive stadium. In SoFi in Los Angeles, you can pay £14.70 for the beef nachos, plus 10 per cent sales tax plus tip. At least you cannot doubt the range of products on offer.

It’s just that I think you’d have to be silly to buy any of it. There are clearly times that call for emergency measures, such as a hungry child needing a meal ahead of an evening kick off after wanting to get into the stadium very early, or fancying some salty crisps after a day on the pop. But otherwise… nope.

In my experience, football supporters are prepared to accept uninspiring, make-do stadium food if it is relatively cheap. They are also prepared to pay a premium – although not to the point of piss-take – for decent food. One of the conclusions of my Doing The 92 series was that we live in an age where you can eat bao buns outside a League One football ground. This small, expensive, tasteless (other than the mustard) hot dog ticks none of those boxes.

I’ve seen very few queues for concessions in World Cup stadia, either before the match or at half-time. Anecdotal evidence suggests that US spectators are more likely to buy than foreigners, presumably because they are used to the prices. But few other people are.

Which is in some way reassuring. Perhaps there is a price point at which we can say no to being gouged. Perhaps we do deserve better. But also: why on earth would you be stupid enough to eat in the stadium anyway?

On the Road USA

Join Daniel Storey on his 7,200-mile odyssey across the US to tell the stories of a World Cup like no other.

Sign up to his free newsletter here and get it delivered to your inbox throughout the tournament.

People are very down on the quality of American food; it is a running joke in the UK. Yes, there is a seemingly endless list of fast food options serving pretty tepid fare. Yes, this is the natural home of deep-frying beige products to make them a little less beige. Yes, the portions are massive (is that bad?!). And yes, lots of these things are tempting because they are literally created to be addictive.

But that’s only a small part of the American food climate, even if its cultural dominance through television advertising and vast billboards persuades you otherwise. I’d say that has been the element of travelling to – and around – America that has surprised most supporters. In Warrensburg, Missouri on Thursday evening, a Dutch fan seemed more excited about the slow-cooked meat he had been eating than beating Tunisia 3-1 that day.

In large cities, where games are hosted, America’s vast immigrant communities offer a wealth of choice for just about every cuisine imaginable: Mexican, Chinese, Italian, Vietnamese, Japanese are the most common. These communities created a food truck culture which has grown exponentially in volume, value and quality over the last decade.

https://www.instagram.com/p/DZ64sxmhZUS/

Even in the smallest towns in the southern states, the average quality of Mexican food is exceptional. When you move further north, you find barbecue better than anything I’ve eaten in the UK in every provincial town. I had the best sliced brisket of my life (see video above) in a pit barbecue restaurant in Lindsay, Texas. Lindsay has a population of 1,045.

Perhaps we should be thanking the World Cup’s venue operators and concession partners for trying to charge spectators so much and seeing relatively few takers. Inadvertently, they have persuaded travellers here to find different, better value, better quality options that rail against the stereotypes of American food culture. I won’t be buying another hot dog, junior or otherwise.

from Football - The i Paper https://ift.tt/hEHbaXL

I have no idea how good England are, and it’s partly my job to know. If you think you have a handle on where Thomas Tuchel is, what his defence will be for the next match and whether we have actually played well or how Tuchel wants us to play yet, fair play.

England were good for one half against Croatia, no halves against Ghana and one half against Panama, albeit winning 2-0 was probably just about par for the course.

I would posit that this has been the most confusing England group stage of my lifetime. And here is why.

The lurches in performance

It didn’t feel inappropriate to praise England after the second half against Croatia. It was England’s most fluid major tournament performance against decent opposition since the 4-0 against Ukraine in Euro 2020. We thought we knew what this England team were going to be and we liked it.

And then they promptly went three halves of football against the third and fourth best teams in the group without scoring. And then when we were all preparing angry social media posts (guilty), England clicked and scored twice. So was the fun the exception or the truth? Are we a control team or a chaos team?

Breaking teams down

Perhaps this shouldn’t have surprised us, given England scored three goals in 180 minutes against Andorra in qualifying. But I think we can at least be certain that England struggle to break down low blocks because the wingers struggle to dribble past full-backs and Harry Kane isn’t really a poacher anymore.

But that certainty creates its own confusion. The assumption is that England will be better against stronger opponents because they won’t just sit deep, but why would any manager not just tell his team to soak up England pressure, provoke overcommitment of players and then hit us on the break? Will we be better against better or just lose to the first decent opposition?

The new manager

Lots of this uncertainty comes from having the first new manager at a major tournament since Roy Hodgson lost to Iceland. It has actually been a virtual mirror of the 2022 World Cup, when England got busy in the first game (6-2), drew the second 0-0 and won the third fairly comfortably but having been level at half-time.

But then Tuchel was supposed to be different. He still might be, if he proves himself capable of beating a high-end nation in a major tournament outside England. It’s just that the group stage have given us no reliable information as to whether that will happen or not.

The stars turning up

For all that England laboured in sections of all three group games, the general aim at a major tournament is to have your world-class attacking players involved in the most moments that matter.

England have played three games. Kane has scored three goals and Jude Bellingham has two. Bellingham has two man-of-the-match awards, Kane one. This is good, right? So why does it not quite feel right yet?

The right-backs

Every England melodrama needs a farcical storyline and England’s right-back situation is it. We’ve not picked the guy from Real Madrid. We’ve picked the two guys who are good but injury prone and one of them got injured and went home and the other got injured and is still there. We called up a central defender to play at right-back and now he’s injured too.

This may be something that we all look back on and laugh in a few months. It might also be a defining theme of England’s tournament. To clarify: again, no idea.

The opponents

I think this is an underrated element of the confusion. We are used to Croatia being really good and also solid defensively; they had a high defensive line and England won a chaos match against a side that looked way past its best. Ghana had been appalling for most of the last 12 months and then produced a phenomenal low block display under a new manager.

Read more

• England: Tuchel’s bold solution to Bellingham problem will transform the knockouts
• Michael Hincks: Joe Hart is saving the BBC’s World Cup

And we beat Panama 6-1 in 2018 to create unrealistic expectations and clearly they’re a competent team in most areas now. It’s one thing not knowing if your own team is playing well. It’s another not knowing how good your opponents are either.

The rest of the competition

England are here to win the World Cup. Everybody in the camp says as much. Inevitably you also look across to see how potential peers and challengers are getting on. That also clouds all logic.

France have been sensational in attack and seem viable favourites. England have scored more goals than Spain. Netherlands drew with Japan but then clicked. Same with Brazil against Morocco. Argentina have strolled through the groups but haven’t been tested yet. I don’t even know what to think about Germany and Portugal. This isn’t helping, is it?

from Football - The i Paper https://ift.tt/439MjFe

METLIFE STADIUM — It is job done for England after they dispatched Panama in New Jersey to book a knockout tie in Atlanta next week.

In teeming rain they made heavy weather of the first half but goals from man of the match Jude Bellingham and Harry Kane eased the nerves in the second half.

It answered questions about England’s inability to unlock low blocks but there is still a measure of uncertainty about how they’ll fare against the better sides in North America.

Those are questions for another day, though. For now, England can reflect on completing the first part of their World Cup assignment with the minimum of fuss.

Jordan Pickford – 6/10

I don’t know why but I feel a bit uneasy about Pickford at this tournament, even if this was a second successive clean sheet. Perhaps it’s because his distribution hasn’t been up to his usual high standards?

Jarell Quansah – 6/10

Didn’t do anything wrong but he’s no right-back, is he? A big worry that he limped off in the second half because England’s options in this role are dwindling.

Jarell Quansah is heading off…

Djed Spence comes on for the Three Lions pic.twitter.com/buT54CovSn

— ITV Football (@itvfootball) June 27, 2026

Ezri Konsa – 6/10

England looked a little vulnerable on the counter and that is something to watch when they take on the bigger teams. Konsa seems installed ahead of John Stones now.

Marc Guehi – 6/10

There is still legitimate questions about this defence against better sides given Panama had a couple of big chances in the closing stages in New Jersey. When he lost Jose Fajardo in injury time it nearly cost England a goal.

Nico O’Reilly – 6/10

He’s not going to let anyone down at left-back but we’re yet to see the side of him that had Manchester City fans purring in the run-in. Perhaps when they play better sides?

Elliot Anderson – 7/10

A new challenge for Anderson with the double pivot – and his midfield protection – gone but he prospered here. He covers so much ground it’s impossible not to be impressed.

Jude Bellingham – 9/10

Was it a fever dream or was there really a debate about whether Bellingham started before the tournament began? Always looked like the spark here and his instinctive volley got the ball rolling. Genuine world-class talent.

ENGLAND BREAK THE DEADLOCK!

Jude Bellingham taps in from a corner… The Three Lions top the group as it stands pic.twitter.com/WVtY6x5Qbb

— ITV Football (@itvfootball) June 27, 2026

Bukayo Saka – 7/10

Any England fan who criticised Arsenal’s set pieces should quietly delete those tweets. That’s two of the five goals they’ve scored here coming from Ashburton Grove. Saka’s return showed what we’ve been missing.

Morgan Rogers – 5/10

Hmm, there wasn’t a lot to get excited about here. Maybe he wasn’t deployed in his favourite role but you’d still expect more ball progression from a player with his devastating pace.

Marcus Rashford – 7/10

Did more, from an attacking perspective, in his first ten minutes than Anthony Gordon had done in two starts. But it was a bit of an erratic display with some profligacy mixed with some great stuff.

Harry Kane – 7/10

Not the all-action performance of Dallas but a third World Cup goal and he’s now the outright all-time top scorer in this competition for England. Remains Mr Reliable.

HARRY KANE MAKES IT TWO!

Bellingham turns provider and suddenly England are cruising

Kane becomes England's all-time top scorer at World Cup finals pic.twitter.com/cWdElDoCN2

— ITV Football (@itvfootball) June 27, 2026

Subs

Djed Spence – 6/10

England’s last man standing at right-back. He did fine but England will be worried about the number of injuries they’ve got there.

Noni Madueke – 6/10

Some nice flashes of pace as England stretched tired Panama legs.

Eberechi Eze – 6/10

Didn’t have much time to impress.

Read more

• England: I took England fans’ rip-off £75 train journey in the US
• Mark Douglas: Trust David Beckham to make the World Cup all about himself

Jordan Henderson – 6/10

Few minutes at the end felt like recognition for his work behind-the-scenes in the camp.

Ollie Watkins – 6/10

A few minutes at the end for England’s striking plan B.

from Football - The i Paper https://ift.tt/r5v0Xfo

METLIFE STADIUM — On his day, there is nobody like Jude Bellingham. He is such an intricate talent, however, that unlocking his true potential is a challenge that can twist the greatest footballing minds into knots.

He has all the physical attributes to be a devastating No 10. His tactical awareness and in-game intelligence make him the perfect foil for a juggernaut of a goalscorer like Harry Kane too.

For England especially, Bellingham can drift in and out of the game all too readily as a staccato shadow striker. It has become the leitmotif of Thomas Tuchel’s England reign so far.

To his credit, Tuchel has failed to succumb to a problem that has stumped others who came before. His decision to move Bellingham deeper alongside Elliot Anderson against Panama, with Morgan Rogers playing off Harry Kane, was certainly a bold one.

It is not a system that the dogmatic German would perhaps deploy against elite opposition – effectively a front five – but Bellingham’s all-action, high-octane display – with one goal and sublime assist to fire England to top spot in the group – provided a potential answer to the quandary managers often find themselves in over the Real Madrid star.

Shifting to a flatter 4-3-3 should therefore be considered as England’s weapon of choice going forward. If a fit-again Declan Rice cannot be left out, and Anderson’s metronomic abilities are impossible to omit, then Bellingham alongside Tuchel’s go-to pair may well become that previously elusive winning formula.

The pouring rain in New Jersey gave the MetLife Stadium a home-game feel for England. A much-changed England would surely be energised by Bukayo Saka and Marcus Rashford’s return, against a team they thrashed 6-0 in their last World Cup meeting. This was, to all intents and purposes, a shoo-in, a matter of many England would score.

In the opening 45 minutes, Kane had 10 touches, fewer than any other player on the pitch. A top-heavy England looked vulnerable on the counter, while again struggling to break through a low block.

Rashford came close to breaking the deadlock on several occasions, but otherwise it was a familiar tale of England unable to make use of their possession domination to any great effect.

Panama are not the international backwater they used to be. Since that 2018 humbling in Russia, they have finished runner-up in the Gold Cup and Nations League, beating the United States in the latter semi-finals.

They still represented opposition a team as talented as England should put to the sword. Especially when the big players step up. Kane finally had an impact early in the second half, forcing a fine save from Panama goalkeeper Orlando Mosquera, before Bellingham eventually made one count, volleying home from a Saka corner.

The sashay inside and clipped cross onto the head of Kane to secure victory was the difference between a nervy end and cruising into the knockout stages as group winners.

Dropping into wider positions to create such match-defining moments may not come about if operating closer to Kane, as an orthodox No 10. Engineering space is not an easy task on the international stage, but Bellingham’s change of position at least creates half spaces the very best thrive in.

Read more

• England: I took England fans’ rip-off £75 train journey in the US
• Mark Douglas: Trust David Beckham to make the World Cup all about himself

This set-up may be too kamikaze later on, but creating a role for Bellingham from deep is still possible.

The Panama experiment just about paid off, but the formula is not 100 per cent proof yet. One thing is for sure: Tuchel’s most pertinent task is to replicate Bellingham the deep-lying force again in the knockout stages.

The results could be devastating.

from Football - The i Paper https://ift.tt/05YkPF2

England take on Panama in their final Group L game at the World Cup on Saturday night.

The Three Lions are in action at the MetLife Stadium, or the New York New Jersey Stadium in Fifa parlance, where the final will take place on 19 July.

England are looking to top the group tonight, but after an underwhelming draw against Ghana they have work to do.

Thomas Tuchel’s side lead the way in Group L on four points, the same as Ghana, who are in action against Croatia at the same time.

It could come down to goal difference, therefore, meaning England will look to put Panama to the sword as they did at the 2018 World Cup when winning 6-1 – Harry Kane scored a hat-trick on that occasion.

Follow live updates below

from Football - The i Paper https://ift.tt/XvaL0Hw

The best saves from an England goalkeeper at this World Cup happen each time Joe Hart appears in BBC’s Salford studio.

Hart is saving BBC’s coverage, and while ITV may be winning the broadcasting battle, the Beeb could yet win the war thanks to his articulate insight.

The 39-year-old played in three major tournaments for England. He was handed his debut by Fabio Capello, was a mainstay of the Roy Hodgson era, and then lost the No 1 gloves under Gareth Southgate to current incumbent Jordan Pickford.

With 75 caps he knows what it means to wear the shirt, the weight it carries, and the pain that comes with it, given the dispiriting era in which he was England’s best goalkeeper.

And yet he does not give in to misery. Instead, while providing perspective from this often-overlooked position, Hart makes you think about the game differently, something every pundit should strive for.

Before England’s draw with Ghana, his segment on Pickford’s distribution against Croatia was comfortably the most enlightening part of the BBC’s build-up.

In less than three minutes Hart transformed the way I watched the 90 minutes that followed, tracking not only Pickford but how the movement in front of him was influencing his decisions. In a drab game, it was nice to have at least learned something.

At half-time, Hart even gave a reasoned response to the first-half hydration break not being called early. “I’m probably the person you don’t want to talk to Gabby, because I like clarity,” he told presenter Gabby Logan. “If it can’t be done until the 23rd minute, so be it, it takes away the conversation.”

Wait! We want hyperbole! We want anger! We want our pundits spitting feathers through our Ultra HD televisions! Except, many don’t, and though rare, rational views are only more vital in a world where hot takes get more airtime.

Hart also has the experience to boot. He may have been an unused substitute at the 2010 World Cup when Adidas’s Jabulani ball wreaked havoc on goalkeepers, but he would have been flummoxed by that bamboozling ball in training.

At the current World Cup, something similar is happening, with Adidas’ four-panelled Trionda ball leading to several goals where goalkeepers have got their hands to efforts but have been unable to keep them out. One Croatia goal against Pickford included.

“I’m seeing this goal way too many times for there to not be something up with that football,” Hart said, noting how the ball’s trajectory is catching goalkeepers off guard, their timing not quite right.

Hart knows, and evidently the BBC has clocked onto that too, with the former Manchester City goalkeeper dining at their top punditry table for England coverage alongside Wayne Rooney and Micah Richards.

Given his stature, Rooney is always going to be the go-to voice. The BBC is yet to release its 2025-26 pay list, but as their marquee signing after Gary Lineker freed up £1.35m in wages, it is safe to assume the ex-England captain is collecting a fair chunk of that money – hence the frequency in which they use him.

Hart is probably on considerably less than his former England teammate, but pound-for-pound no pundit is better on the BBC at this World Cup.

Read more

Daniel Storey: I owe Americans an apology

Mark Douglas: The awkward truth about England fans at the World Cup

He even brings the best out of Rooney, and while that may sound misguided footballspeak given this is a studio and not a pitch, Hart is the calming influence all goalkeepers need to be and makes his fellow pundits look more comfortable.

When Rooney took the lead on the first piece of video analysis after England’s draw with Ghana, Hart effortlessly weighed in. This was no shouting match, there was no finger-pointing, and mercifully there was no doom-mongering despite the result tempering expectations.

After all, Rooney and Hart have experienced the heat emanating from the media as players, so here they are setting the tone now they are pundits, making for a welcome post-match breakdown before louder noises surface elsewhere.

When possible the BBC should deploy Hart at any given opportunity.

from Football - The i Paper https://ift.tt/lZFMTYo