Welcome to a special edition of The Score, Daniel Storey’s weekly verdict on all 20 Premier League teams’ performances. This week he takes a look at their dealings in the January transfer window. Sign up here to receive the newsletter every Monday morning
Arsenal
Well you can’t say that Arsenal haven’t trimmed the fat from their squad. Five vaguely first-team players left the Emirates before deadline day with no replacements, leaving supporters worried about a squad light on numbers. And then they allowed Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang to join Barcelona without signing anyone to fill that void.
In isolation, there were clear arguments for every exit and Mikel Arteta would reason that long-termism must win out. Arteta clearly decided that those who have left, even on loan, are not up to standard. The only mistake was not being ruthless on them earlier and thus managing to sell them on permanent deals for significant transfer fees.
The Aubameyang farce – on, off and on again on deadline day – resolved itself in the best possible way. Again failing to get a fee for their former captain and top goalscorer should be considered to be a backwards step, but that damage was done in awarding him such an overinflated salary. Saving £25m in wages and ridding the squad of a senior player in whom Arteta had clearly lost all faith is a satisfactory conclusion of a deeply unsatisfactory decline.
More on Arsenal FC
But with only 20 players in the first-team squad and Arsenal just two points off the top four with a game in hand, this January will be perceived as a missed opportunity to kick on. The mood will depend upon three things: 1) the ability of Saka, Smith-Rowe and Odegaard to provide a goalscoring threat as well as their creative one; 2) Arsenal’s immediate results after the close of the window given that they are low on strikers and haven’t scored in four matches; 3) the avoidance of injuries in positions where they are now lighter on numbers than they were a month ago.
Transfer window rating: 5 (out of 10)
Aston Villa
It says plenty about Aston Villa’s new-found ambitions that plenty of supporters were left concerned by Matt Targett’s loan to Newcastle United because now there is only Ashley Young to be backup for Lucas Digne. That’s when you know things are going well.
As with every team here, we are dealing only in hypotheticals. We can make no firm conclusions about how transfers will work out. But in the signings of Philippe Coutinho and Digne, Aston Villa’s owners offered evidence that they believe their club merits status as the biggest challenger to the Big Six. Steven Gerrard’s midfield options alone rank amongst the best in the division and then he added Robin Olsen and Calum Chambers as defensive cover.
Villa have also avoided stockpiling players. The departure of Wesley, Targett, Keinan Davis and Anwar El Ghazi may only be temporary, but Gerrard has clearly made up his mind on each of them and it would be a surprise to see any in Villa’s first-team squad next season. Like his seniors, Gerrard is ambitious and has demanded upgrades. The only fly in the ointment is the lack of new central defender given the wavering form of Tyrone Mings, but Chambers could play there if required.
Transfer window rating: 9
Brentford
Jonas Lossl may have arrived as an emergency signing following the injury to David Raya and the tribulations of Alvaro Fernandez, but the headline news waited until the final morning of the window. There are reasons for Christian Eriksen to have chosen Brentford – familiar city, manager he knows from his youth, international teammates – but it is still an extraordinary coup for a promoted team. It is also wonderful to see Eriksen back in the game.
Eriksen’s stay may well be short. If he performs well and stays healthy then he will have higher-profile suitors and if he fails to perform well Brentford will wish him well and say goodbye after the six-month contract expires. But Thomas Frank’s team have lacked creativity in central areas and, at his best, Eriksen was one of the best in Europe at picking passes and finding space. It will be fascinating to see how this works out.
Transfer window rating: 7
Brighton
How very Brighton, as another transfer window passes by without them adding a new striker to their squad. Graham Potter did sign two first-team players, but one of those has been loaned to sister club Royale Union St-Gilloise and the other was signed from there but allowed to stay until the summer. Which doesn’t help Brighton much now.
Potter will be happy to have cleared out some deadwood – Aaron Connolly and Jurgen Locadia in particular – and delighted that Yves Bissouma is still a Brighton player. He may also reason that the best time to do business is in the summer when long-term plans can be drawn up.
But with Dan Burn leaving for Newcastle on deadline day, there’s little doubt that Potter is dealing with a weaker squad than he had on 1 January. Time for him to take another large jug of water and turn it into wine.
Transfer window rating: 4
Burnley
Who knows if Burnley have improved their squad. They have sold a striker in Chris Wood who was dependable, even if his goalscoring rate had dropped off over the course of this season. They have bought a striker in Wout Weghorst who fits the Dyche model of physically imposing, back-to-goal centre forward who scored almost 70 Bundesliga goals in three-and-a-half seasons at Wolfsburg but whose potential to continue that in the Premier League is entirely unknown.
On balance, a £13m transfer fee profit probably swings those two deals in Burnley’s favour. But that Weghorst was the only arrival is a clear negative given Burnley’s perilous league position. Mislav Orsic looked as if he was the answer to reducing the creative onus on Dwight McNeil and Maxwel Cornet, but that deal collapsed when Orsic chose to stay in Zagreb. Unless Weghorst fires immediately, Dyche is effectively working with the same squad that has taken 12 points from 18 league games.
Transfer window rating: 5
Chelsea
Very little to say because there’s very little to discuss. In 2017-18, Chelsea bought Emerson Palmieri, Olivier Giroud and Ross Barkley in the January transfer window.
More on Chelsea FC
Since then, Christian Pulisic (2019) is their only permanent midseason signing and their only transfer business this year was to let Lewis Baker leave Stamford Bridge for Stoke City. Exciting stuff.
Transfer window rating: 6
Crystal Palace
A good window became a tepid one with the news that Donny van de Beek preferred a move to Goodison over Selhurst Park and that Eddie Nketiah would not be arriving from Arsenal. It left Jean-Philippe Mateta – who was already on loan at Palace – and Luke Plange – who will back out on loan – as their only first-team arrivals.
But that need not cause great panic. If we assume that Patrick Vieira’s side are not in serious relegation danger, they will enter the summer having lost Cheikhou Kouyate (who is likely to leave on a free transfer when his contract expires) and Conor Gallagher. It makes more sense to seek replacements for them at the point they leave.
Transfer window rating: 6
Everton
A rollercoaster month ends with supporters just about back onside, but it is impossible to conclude with any certainty whether Everton have generated enough goodwill to shift a mood that seemed likely to take them increasingly close to peril.
Firstly, let’s be frank (ignore that pun). A well-run, stable club does not appoint a new manager on the final day of a transfer window. It does not sack a manager four days after selling one of your best players because said manager has fallen out with him and three weeks after your owner has gone on live radio to publicly back him.
But having that series of rotten mistakes, Everton have at least attempted a salvage job. They were dissuaded from appointing Vitor Pereira and were surely sensible to do so. It is hard to tell whether Frank Lampard is a good fit or not, but he is at least the more popular choice. Given the mood at Goodison lately, that matters.
And their transfer business is, on the surface, exciting. Nathan Patterson is rated highly. Donny van de Beek and Dele Alli provide creativity from central midfield that Everton badly lacked under Rafa Benitez, even though it isn’t quite clear how you fit both into the same team. Vitaliy Mykolenko must suffer the fate of not being Lucas Digne, but Lampard is likely to give everyone a clean slate.
More on Everton FC
If we consider that Everton are firmly in a relegation battle, only Newcastle signed more players. Their season will only be saved if Lampard can hit the ground running, and there’s a chance that this could go sour very quickly, but Everton supporters will at least have woken on Tuesday morning infinitely more hopeful than they were a month ago.
Transfer window rating: 7
Leeds United
“Marcelo Bielsa has exacting standards of the type of player he likes to recruit, typically those who are able to meet his physical demands but also prepared to be moulded by a manager. That’s hard to find in January because it leaves little time for them to acclimatise to Bielsa’s system and because Bielsa has been so reluctant to use the transfer market in midseason.” So said my preview to the January transfer window… and so it proved.
There were links to Takumi Minamino that never materialised and a host of other names who merely passed on the gossip column wind, but Leeds ended the window as they started it. At least Raphinha hasn’t gone anywhere and Kalvin Phillips and Patrick Bamford will be back soon.
Transfer window rating: 5
Leicester City
An unsurprising, if therefore flat, transfer window for Leicester City. With the owner’s wealth related to the performance of the travel industry in the midst of a global pandemic, it always seemed unlikely that Brendan Rodgers would splurge. He signed five players last summer on the understanding that there would be little to spend in January.
That said, supporters were hopeful that an exception might be made for another central defender after the injury to Wesley Fofana and the continued struggles of Jonny Evans to stay fit and Caglar Soyuncu to avoid making mistakes. It barely seemed that Leicester made offers for players, let alone got close to signing any.
Transfer window rating: 4
Liverpool
Liverpool – and Jurgen Klopp – do not really like buying January. They believe that the market is inflated by desperation and that desperation is proof of poor planning. The best clubs make their moves in the summer.
But they are also perfectly prepared to be opportunistic. They signed Virgil van Dijk in January and he has become one of the best defenders in the club’s history. And when they learned of Tottenham’s pursuit of Luis Diaz, they took their chance to make a move.
There was talk of gazumping, and there is little doubt Spurs’ approach helped Liverpool. They had persuaded Porto to countenance a sale and persuaded Diaz – and his agent – that a move was palatable. They could also offer far more than Tottenham: a title challenge, a club with solid foundations, high-class teammates, Champions League football.
Diaz is not a replacement for anybody. Klopp now has five forwards for three places and can rotate as he sees fit in three competitions. He neither needs to rush Diaz into a spate of first-team starts while he acclimatises to life in England nor needs to rush Sadio Mane and Mohamed Salah back when they return from Afcon. This is the best of both worlds.
More on Liverpool FC
Liverpool beating Tottenham to Diaz summarises where the two clubs are at right now30 January, 2022
i's guide to the Carabao Cup final - date, TV channel for Chelsea against Liverpool27 January, 2022
When every Premier League player will return from Afcon - including Liverpool's Salah and Mane26 January, 2022And Salah is worthy of mention here, for the signing of Diaz will have given Liverpool greater leverage in those contract negotiations and allayed some fears of supporters who are concerned about a lack of ambition on FSG’s part. Now just to hope Diaz is as good as everybody thinks he is going to be.
Finally, there need be no panic about the failure to get Fabio Carvalho over the line. He was going back out to Fulham on loan anyway and their January pursuit will surely make the deal a formality in the summer. Some people just like having things to fret over.
Transfer window rating: 8
Manchester City
The signing of Julian Alvarez may well be a masterstroke, given that he was one of the best young players in South America last year, can play centrally or out wide and only cost £14m at the age of 22. He will presumably replace Ferran Torres, on whom City made more than £30m profit on an attacker who had only played four times in the Premier League this season.
With Alvarez staying at River Plate until the summer, you’d have to argue that City’s squad is weaker than at the start of the season. But then given the depth of the squad and their commanding lead in the Premier League – despite the Southampton draw – that likely doesn’t matter. Pep Guardiola will hope that Alvarez is his latest Argentinean prodigy.
Transfer window rating: 7
Manchester United
Manchester United entered this transfer window in precisely the same position as any other: doubts over the long-term future of the manager, an inability to fit current players into a coherent system, several expensive pieces of deadwood needing to leave and with a flashing neon sign marked “holding midfielder” that described the pressing need.
In their defence, players have been cut from the squad, albeit only on temporary deals that simply kick the can slightly further down the road. Anthony Martial began his Manchester United career with plenty of promise but waned badly, while Donny van de Beek’s barely began at all. But they are at least out of sight and out of mind. The treatment of those two players was a sort of such intense discussion between supporters that a decision of any sort is a step in the right direction.
But then United have not really stepped forward anyway. Buying the superstar holding midfielder they needed was probably never likely in January – if Declan Rice or Kalvin Phillips are the two top choices than that would have to wait until a summer window – but there were cut-price options available who would have vastly improved their midfield. Denis Zakaria cost Juventus £5m. Bissouma would have been available had they bid £45m.
More on Manchester United FC
WhatsApp, phantom medicals and agent 'Hail Marys' - inside the madness of transfer deadline day31 January, 2022
Manchester United striker Mason Greenwood arrested on suspicion of rape and assault30 January, 2022
Man Utd weighing up new Lingard bid from Newcastle as Martial joins Sevilla25 January, 2022Some deadwood still remains. Phil Jones reportedly turned down a loan move to Bordeaux and Jesse Linard must be furious about United’s demands to allow his loan exit. If nothing else, let the experience of those two – and other – players be a warning to United that they must not sanction new contracts for fringe members of their first-team squad.
And so United will plod on, no problems solved but at least none badly exacerbated. They still need a central midfielder or two, they still need a definite identity, they still have highly talented but underperforming players and they still have at least four players whose futures must be decided definitively in the summer. Plus ca change.
Transfer window rating: 4
Newcastle United
Read Mark Douglas’ verdict on Newcastle’s first transfer window under their new owners here.
Transfer window rating: 8
More on Newcastle United FC
Norwich City
Three weeks ago, the thought of Norwich failing to sign anyone in January may have caused social media mutiny amongst their supporters. Their side had lost their previous six league matches without scoring and Dean Smith seemed unable to shift the pattern established during 12 months of Premier League football under Daniel Farke.
But since then, things have changed. Norwich have won their last two, are outside the relegation zone as things stand (albeit having played more games than those below them) and Smith has changed the team’s shape to great effect. The importance of Josh Sargent and Adam Idah has increased drastically.
In that context, you can understand why Smith did not push for more deals. Perhaps this will all come back to haunt Norwich, and they will curse not signing a central defender (Nat Phillips went to the Championship after all). But, for now, Smith and Norwich merit our faith. They have rarely been a club that panics in the transfer market.
Transfer window rating: 6
Southampton
When Ralph Hasenhuttl was asked at the beginning of January about whether Southampton’s takeover might allow him to improve the squad in the current transfer window, he seemed very upbeat.
“We get the chance to be earlier in our signings, definitely,” Hasenhuttl said. “It doesn’t mean that we change our behaviour and go out into the market and buy everything that is available for us – that doesn’t make sense. But this new owner gives us the chance to get these guys earlier, maybe even this winter when before they are only coming in the summer. So we can go very early for these players and this is what we want to have.”
Southampton’s CEO Martin Semmens was a little more circumspect, pointing out that the new owners had bought the club because they liked the way in which it operated and that their data-driven approach was likely to bear more fruit in the summer rather than the mad rush of January.
But it is still a little surprising that Hasenhuttl has no new players as February begins. Perhaps the club merely decided that eight points from their last five league games has allayed any relegation concerns. If so, fine. Perhaps the right players just weren’t available and so they preferred to wait. We will reserve judgement until August. The job until then is to bob around near midtable.
Transfer window rating: 5
Tottenham
Oh Tottenham, you little tinkers. Just as we – and pretty much every Spurs supporter – were preparing to lambast Antonio Conte’s seniors for failing to back their man and risk causing a rift between club and manager that would have ruined any chances of desperately needed progress, along came two deadline day signings who really could make an immediate difference.
We should not ignore that this transfer window started miserably. Tottenham missed out on Luis Diaz, who preferred Liverpool. They missed out on Adama Traore, who preferred Barcelona. They missed out on Ollie Tanner, who preferred to stay at Lewes and provoked a thousand banters about Tottenham even being turned down by non-league players.
And for an owner who had forged a reputation for being a master negotiator, Tottenham’s exits in January have been an admission of gross mistakes. In the space of two days, they allowed three players to leave on loan who were signed for over £100m and let Dele Alli – once discussed as a £100m midfielder – join another Premier League team on a deal that may well only cost Everton £10m. These are extraordinary events for a club that is looking to punch above its weight.
More on Tottenham Hotspur FC
Lampard's guidance could be just what Alli needs to kickstart his career at Everton31 January, 2022
How Tottenham could line up with Kulusevski and Bentancur - and their best positions explained31 January, 2022Liverpool beating Tottenham to Diaz summarises where the two clubs are at right now30 January, 2022But Spurs, Fabio Paratici and Daniel Levy did save themselves on the final day. Rodrigo Bentancur should provide much needed energy to central midfield – the anti-Ndombele, perhaps – and forge a link between midfield and attack that has often been a little lacking when Oliver Skipp is not on the pitch. Dejan Kulusevski can play anywhere behind a centre forward – the right wing seems most likely when Kane and Son are fit – and is an inexpensive gamble given that his move will only become permanent if certain obligations are met.
If nothing else, those final days prove that Conte is being bestowed the power to shape this squad as he sees fit. Loaning out Lo Celso, Ndombele and Gil – three of the club’s most expensive signings – suggests both that Conte didn’t fancy any of them and that the club were happy to swallow pride and listen to Conte’s instruction.
Transfer window rating: 7
Watford
From our January transfer window preview: “This is Watford, so there will be deals. This is Watford, so there will be signings that you have never heard of, some of whom prove to be brilliant value for money and some who you forget about within three months. This is Watford, so goodness only knows if they have the same manager who signed them at the start of next season.”
Step forward Maduka Okoye, Hassane Kamara, Samir, Edo Kayembe and Samuel Kalu. Also step forward Roy Hodgson, a new manager to oversee them. As we said, this is Watford.
Transfer window rating: 5 (with absolutely no degree of certainty)
West Ham
David Moyes, 11 January: “We could probably do with some more cover after Angelo Ogbonna’s season-long injury. If I can get Kurt [Zouma] back quickly that eases the pressure in central defensive areas. But we are always looking to strengthen here, we are always looking to find players who can help us or improve us.”
David Moyes, 21 January: “The board have been really good. They have supported me greatly and said ‘go and get what you need if you can David.’ Like everything else things are expensive in this window and there’s not a great pool for the positions we are looking for. The last couple of January windows we’ve been able to do that, but this window has felt a wee bit more difficult. But if things go right and we get a good run of things I am still hopeful that we will add a couple of players before the window closes.”
West Ham signings by 1 February: None.
A dry January does not stop West Ham maintaining a brilliant season, but this month will be perceived as what might have been should Moyes’ side finish fifth or sixth. It is a damn shame that they couldn’t get a deal done for Jesse Lingard.
Transfer window rating: 4
Wolves
Not an awful lot to say. They signed three players, two of which immediately went out on loan and the other is a Portugal Under-21 international and Jorge Mendes client, which is pretty much the standard Wolves January transfer window. They also confirmed that Hwang Hee-chan will join on a permanent deal in the summer for a reported £12m, which makes sense.
But there is a vague sense of missed opportunity here. Bruno Lage has Wolves four points off the top four with a game in hand on Manchester United. There is no pressure on him to deliver a top-six finish given the preseason expectations, but chances like these don’t come around every season.
Maybe this is simply the reality of life with Mendes, but losing one of your most exciting attacking players (albeit one who wasn’t starting regularly under Lage) while failing to add any senior players makes an already unlikely task even harder.
Transfer window rating: 5
from Football – inews.co.uk https://ift.tt/Qd8Ao3c1R
Post a Comment