Manchester City have had their two-year ban from the Champions League lifted by the Court of Arbitration for Sport.
However, the club was found guilty of failing to cooperate with Uefa’s investigation and will be fined €10m (£9m).
The news will come as a blow to the likes of Chelsea, Manchester United and Leicester City, who must now finish in the top four of the Premier League in order to qualify for next season’s Champions League.
Why CAS overturned Man City’s ban
Uefa’s club financial control body (CFCB) sanctioned City in February for what it said was a breach of its Financial Fair Play (FFP) and club licensing regulations.
The CFCB said City had overstated sponsorship revenue in their accounts and in the break-even information submitted to Uefa between 2012 and 2016, and for failing to cooperate with its investigation.
City immediately signalled their intention to appeal, and CAS has now cleared them to compete in the Champions League next season and reduced a €30 euro fine to €10m.
In its verdict, CAS stated that City “did not disguise equity funding as sponsorship contributions” however, they did “fail to cooperate with Uefa authorities”.
CAS verdict in full
Lausanne, 13 July 2020 – The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) has issued its decision in the
arbitration procedure between Manchester City Football Club and the Union of European Football Associations (UEFA).The case concerns an appeal filed by Manchester City FC (MCFC) against the decision of the
Adjudicatory Chamber of the UEFA Club Financial Control Body (CFCB) dated 14 February 2020 in which it was deemed to have contravened UEFA’s Club Licensing and Financial Fair Play Regulations and sanctioned with exclusion from participation in UEFA club competitions in the next two seasons and ordered to pay a fine of EUR 30 million.The Panel of arbitrators in charge of the matter, composed of Mr Rui Botica Santos (Portugal), President, Prof. Ulrich Haas (Germany) and Mr Andrew McDougall QC (France), conducted a hearing with the parties, their legal representatives, witnesses and experts on 8, 9 and 10 June 2020.
Following the hearing, the CAS Panel deliberated and concluded that the decision issued on
14 February 2020 by the Adjudicatory Chamber of the CFCB should be set aside and replaced by the following:a.) MCFC has contravened Article 56 of the Club Licensing and Financial Fair Play Regulations.
b.) MCFC shall pay a fine of EUR 10,000,000 to the UEFA, within 30 days as from the date of
issuance of the arbitral award.The CAS award emphasized that most of the alleged breaches reported by the Adjudicatory Chamber of the CFCB were either not established or time-barred. As the charges with respect to any dishonest concealment of equity funding were clearly more significant violations than obstructing the CFCB’s investigations, it was not appropriate to impose a ban on participating in UEFA’s club competitions for MCFC’s failure to cooperate with the CFCB’s investigations alone.
However, considering i) the financial resources of MCFC; ii) the importance of the cooperation of clubs in investigations conducted by the CFCB, because of its limited investigative means; and iii) MCFC’s disregard of such principle and its obstruction of the investigations, the CAS Panel found that a significant fine should be imposed on MCFC and considered it appropriate to reduce UEFA’s initial fine by 2/3, i.e. to the amount of EUR 10 million.
The final award with reasons will be published on the CAS website in a few days.
Follow i sport on Facebook for the latest Premier League news, interviews and features
More on the Premier League
- Exclusive: Premier League refuses to reveal the diversity of its workforce
- Back on their perch? How Liverpool pulled level with Man Utd on major trophies won
- Kevin Garside: Man City’s attention should now turn to Europe… with hope of becoming Liverpool 2019
- Lampard defends role as Chelsea boss after Sterling criticism
- From world-beater at Liverpool to a failure at Barça, Newcastle may be Coutinho’s only hope
from Football – inews.co.uk https://ift.tt/2OjvAZ5
Post a Comment